BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22519296)

  • 1. Cleaning and decontamination efficacy of wiping cloths and silver dihydrogen citrate on food contact surfaces.
    Masuku SM; Babu D; Martin EM; Koo OK; O'Bryan CA; Crandall PG; Ricke SC
    J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 113(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 22519296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A laboratory evaluation of the decontamination properties of microfibre cloths.
    Moore G; Griffith C
    J Hosp Infect; 2006 Dec; 64(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 17055112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal and transfer of viruses on food contact surfaces by cleaning cloths.
    Gibson KE; Crandall PG; Ricke SC
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2012 May; 78(9):3037-44. PubMed ID: 22327573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ATP bioluminescence assay for evaluating cleaning practices in operating theatres: applicability and limitations.
    Sanna T; Dallolio L; Raggi A; Mazzetti M; Lorusso G; Zanni A; Farruggia P; Leoni E
    BMC Infect Dis; 2018 Nov; 18(1):583. PubMed ID: 30453892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of hygienic quality of surfaces in retail food service establishments based on microbial counts and real-time detection of ATP.
    Cunningham AE; Rajagopal R; Lauer J; Allwood P
    J Food Prot; 2011 Apr; 74(4):686-90. PubMed ID: 21477489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tolerance of Salmonella Enteritidis and Staphylococcus aureus to surface cleaning and household bleach.
    Kusumaningrum HD; Paltinaite R; Koomen AJ; Hazeleger WC; Rombouts FM; Beumer RR
    J Food Prot; 2003 Dec; 66(12):2289-95. PubMed ID: 14672226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory evaluation of disposable and reusable disinfectant cloths for cleaning food contact surfaces.
    Tebbutt GM
    Epidemiol Infect; 1988 Oct; 101(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 3141202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study of cleaning standards and practices in food premises in the United Kingdom.
    Sagoo SK; Little CL; Griffith CJ; Mitchell RT
    Commun Dis Public Health; 2003 Apr; 6(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 12736965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the hygiene of ready-to-eat food preparation areas and practices in mobile food vendors in the UK.
    Little C; Sagoo S
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2009 Dec; 19(6):431-43. PubMed ID: 20183200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spread of bacteria on surfaces when cleaning with microfibre cloths.
    Bergen LK; Meyer M; Høg M; Rubenhagen B; Andersen LP
    J Hosp Infect; 2009 Feb; 71(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 19108933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Allergen Removal and Transfer with Wiping and Cleaning Methods Used in Retail and Food Service Establishments.
    Bedford B; Liggans G; Williams L; Jackson L
    J Food Prot; 2020 Jul; 83(7):1248-1260. PubMed ID: 32221544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the decontamination efficacy of new and reprocessed microfiber cleaning cloth compared with other commonly used cleaning cloths in the hospital.
    Diab-Elschahawi M; Assadian O; Blacky A; Stadler M; Pernicka E; Berger J; Resch H; Koller W
    Am J Infect Control; 2010 May; 38(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 20123151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the efficacy of different microfibre cloths at removing surface micro-organisms associated with healthcare-associated infections.
    Smith DL; Gillanders S; Holah JT; Gush C
    J Hosp Infect; 2011 Jul; 78(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 21501897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Salmonella and Shigella in freshly squeezed orange juice, fresh oranges, and wiping cloths collected from public markets and street booths in Guadalajara, Mexico: incidence and comparison of analytical routes.
    Castillo A; Villarruel-López A; Navarro-Hidalgo V; Martínez-González NE; Torres-Vitela MR
    J Food Prot; 2006 Nov; 69(11):2595-9. PubMed ID: 17133801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of cleaning efficacy between in-use disinfectant and electrolysed water in an English residential care home.
    Meakin NS; Bowman C; Lewis MR; Dancer SJ
    J Hosp Infect; 2012 Feb; 80(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 22196853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A modified ATP benchmark for evaluating the cleaning of some hospital environmental surfaces.
    Lewis T; Griffith C; Gallo M; Weinbren M
    J Hosp Infect; 2008 Jun; 69(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 18468725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microfiber cloths reduce the transfer of Clostridium difficile spores to environmental surfaces compared with cotton cloths.
    Trajtman AN; Manickam K; Alfa MJ
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Jul; 43(7):686-9. PubMed ID: 25907782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of a modified cleaning program implemented within an intensive care setting.
    Moore G; Smyth D; Singleton J; Wilson P
    Am J Infect Control; 2010 Oct; 38(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 20605265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of low-pressure foam cleaning compared to conventional cleaning methods in the removal of bacteria from surfaces associated with convenience food.
    Lambrechts AA; Human IS; Doughari JH; Lues JF
    Afr Health Sci; 2014 Sep; 14(3):585-92. PubMed ID: 25352876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a Sampling Area-Adjusted Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence Assay Based on Digital Image Quantification to Assess the Cleanliness of Hospital Surfaces.
    Ho YH; Wang LS; Jiang HL; Chang CH; Hsieh CJ; Chang DC; Tu HY; Chiu TY; Chao HJ; Tseng CC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 27294944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.