These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22519782)

  • 1. Asymmetrical patterns of speciation uniquely support reinforcement in Drosophila.
    Yukilevich R
    Evolution; 2012 May; 66(5):1430-46. PubMed ID: 22519782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.
    Turelli M; Lipkowitz JR; Brandvain Y
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1176-87. PubMed ID: 24325145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The rate test of speciation: estimating the likelihood of non-allopatric speciation from reproductive isolation rates in Drosophila.
    Yukilevich R
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1150-62. PubMed ID: 24274675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the predictions of reinforcement: long-term empirical data from a damselfly mottled hybrid zone.
    Arce-Valdés LR; Ballén-Guapacha AV; Rivas-Torres A; Chávez-Ríos JR; Wellenreuther M; Hansson B; Guillén RAS
    J Evol Biol; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39325673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time in a bottle: the evolutionary fate of species discrimination in sibling Drosophila species.
    Myers EM; Frankino WA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31759. PubMed ID: 22384069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Bewick ER; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
    Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Degree of sympatry affects reinforcement in Drosophila.
    Nosil P
    Evolution; 2013 Mar; 67(3):868-72. PubMed ID: 23461335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlated evolution of male and female reproductive traits drive a cascading effect of reinforcement in Drosophila yakuba.
    Comeault AA; Venkat A; Matute DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 283(1835):. PubMed ID: 27440664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of male and female mating preferences in Drosophila speciation.
    Yukilevich R; Peterson EK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1759-1773. PubMed ID: 31077339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cost of reinforcement: selection on flower color in allopatric populations of Phlox drummondii.
    Hopkins R; Rausher MD
    Am Nat; 2014 May; 183(5):693-710. PubMed ID: 24739201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pervasive reinforcement and the role of sexual selection in biological speciation.
    Hudson EJ; Price TD
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():821-33. PubMed ID: 25149257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Roles of Sexual and Viability Selection in the Evolution of Incomplete Reproductive Isolation: From Allopatry to Sympatry.
    Cotto O; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2017 Nov; 190(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 29053357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geographic contrasts between pre- and postzygotic barriers are consistent with reinforcement in Heliconius butterflies.
    Rosser N; Queste LM; Cama B; Edelman NB; Mann F; Mori Pezo R; Morris J; Segami C; Velado P; Schulz S; Mallet JLB; Dasmahapatra KK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1821-1838. PubMed ID: 31334832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybridization, natural selection, and evolution of reproductive isolation: a 25-years survey of an artificial sympatric area between two mosquito sibling species of the Aedes mariae complex.
    Urbanelli S; Porretta D; Mastrantonio V; Bellini R; Pieraccini G; Romoli R; Crasta G; Nascetti G
    Evolution; 2014 Oct; 68(10):3030-8. PubMed ID: 25041755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sympatric reinforcement of reproductive barriers between Neotinea tridentata and N. ustulata (Orchidaceae).
    Pellegrino G
    J Plant Res; 2016 Nov; 129(6):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 27502952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex.
    Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement: implications for the evolution of prezygotic isolation in sympatry and beyond.
    Ortiz-Barrientos D; Grealy A; Nosil P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():156-82. PubMed ID: 19566707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.