136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22521199)
1. Comparison of neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with head-pushing and head-pulling methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery.
Bastani P; Pourabolghasem S; Abbasalizadeh F; Motvalli L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Jul; 118(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22521199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of "push" and "pull" methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery.
Veisi F; Zangeneh M; Malekkhosravi S; Rezavand N
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Jul; 118(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 22541809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section.
Levy R; Chernomoretz T; Appelman Z; Levin D; Or Y; Hagay ZJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15961214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods.
Fasubaa OB; Ezechi OC; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Akindele ST; Loto OM; Okogbo FO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 12521457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 'push method' with 'Patwardhan's method' on maternal and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing caesarean section in second stage.
Keepanasseril A; Shaik N; Kubera NS; Adhisivam B; Maurya DK
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jul; 39(5):606-611. PubMed ID: 30917720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of the maternal and fetal adverse outcomes of 154 pregnant women with cesarean section in the second stage of labor].
Qu L; Yang Y; Yin Y; Yin TT; Zhang X; Zhou X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 58(12):888-895. PubMed ID: 38123194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia.
Blickstein I
J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 15576265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reverse breech extraction versus the standard approach of pushing the impacted fetal head up through the vagina in caesarean section for obstructed labour: A randomised controlled trial.
Nooh AM; Abdeldayem HM; Ben-Affan O
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 May; 37(4):459-463. PubMed ID: 28141942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean delivery.
Berhan Y; Berhan A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 124(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 24290068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delivery of an Impacted Fetal Head During Cesarean: A Literature Review and Proposed Management Algorithm.
Manning JB; Tolcher MC; Chandraharan E; Rose CH
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2015 Nov; 70(11):719-24. PubMed ID: 26584721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferred way of delivery of the impacted fetal head in cesarean sections during second stage of labor.
Gil M; Chill HH; Kogan L; Porat S; Levitt L; Eliasi E; Dior U
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2386-2393. PubMed ID: 31502321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes from full-dilatation cesarean deliveries using the Fetal Pillow or hand-push method.
Safa H; Beckmann M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):281-284. PubMed ID: 27599604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
Lenz F; Kimmich N; Zimmermann R; Kreft M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 30917799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal extraction maneuvers during cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor.
Krispin E; Fischer O; Kneller M; Arbib N; Salman L; Wiznitzer A; Hadar E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jun; 35(11):2070-2076. PubMed ID: 32546078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction.
Chopra S; Bagga R; Keepanasseril A; Jain V; Kalra J; Suri V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(10):1163-6. PubMed ID: 19925377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial.
Popowski T; Porcher R; Fort J; Javoise S; Rozenberg P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 25583399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abdominal disimpaction with lower uterine segment support as a novel technique to minimize fetal and maternal morbidities during cesarean section for obstructed labor: a case series.
Shazly SA; Elsayed AH; Badran SM; Abdel Badee AY; Ali MK
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Sep; 30(8):695-8. PubMed ID: 23271386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
Kjaergaard H; Olsen J; Ottesen B; Dykes AK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
