192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22521530)
1. Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of in-office cup forcep biopsies versus operating room biopsies for laryngopharyngeal tumors.
Naidu H; Noordzij JP; Samim A; Jalisi S; Grillone GA
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):604-6. PubMed ID: 22521530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The utility of office-based biopsy for laryngopharyngeal lesions: comparison with surgical evaluation.
Richards AL; Sugumaran M; Aviv JE; Woo P; Altman KW
Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):909-12. PubMed ID: 25475923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost Analysis of Channeled, Distal Chip Laryngoscope for In-office Laryngopharyngeal Biopsies.
Marcus S; Timen M; Dion GR; Fritz MA; Branski RC; Amin MR
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):575-579. PubMed ID: 29472150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and cost-effectiveness of intra-office flexible videolaryngoscopy with transoral vocal fold injection in dysphagic patients.
Andrade Filho PA; Carrau RL; Buckmire RA
Am J Otolaryngol; 2006; 27(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 16935175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-office cup biopsy and laryngeal cytology versus operating room biopsy for the diagnosis of pharyngolaryngeal tumors: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Castillo Farías F; Cobeta I; Souviron R; Barberá R; Mora E; Benito A; Royuela A
Head Neck; 2015 Oct; 37(10):1483-7. PubMed ID: 24889909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Office-based dental rehabilitation in children with special healthcare needs using a pediatric sedation service model.
Lalwani K; Kitchin J; Lax P
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 65(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 17307588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investment in new technology research can save future health care dollars.
Reintgen D; Albertini J; Milliotes G; Marshburn J; Cruse CW; Rapaport D; Berman C; Glass F; Fensske N; Einstein AB; Lyman G
J Fla Med Assoc; 1997 Mar; 84(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 9143169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital Video Laryngoscopy and Flexible Endoscopic Biopsies as an Alternative Diagnostic Workup in Laryngopharyngeal Cancer: A Prospective Clinical Study.
Schutte HW; Takes RP; Slootweg PJ; Arts MJPA; Honings J; van den Hoogen FJA; Marres HAM; van den Broek GB
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Nov; 127(11):770-776. PubMed ID: 30192647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Office-based wire-guided open breast biopsy under local anesthesia is accurate and cost effective.
Morris KT; Pommier RF; Vetto JT
Am J Surg; 2000 May; 179(5):422-5. PubMed ID: 10930494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-office biopsy of upper airway lesions: safety, tolerance, and effect on time to treatment.
Lippert D; Hoffman MR; Dang P; McCulloch TM; Hartig GK; Dailey SH
Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):919-23. PubMed ID: 25376857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Flexible fiberoptic in-office laryngeal biopsy].
Cohen JT; Fliss DM
Harefuah; 2009 Jan; 148(1):18-20, 89. PubMed ID: 19320383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions.
Lee F; Smith KA; Chandarana S; Matthews TW; Bosch JD; Nakoneshny SC; Dort JC
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 May; 47(1):31. PubMed ID: 29739442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of a transnasal flexible fiberoptic in-office laryngeal biopsy.
Cohen JT; Safadi A; Fliss DM; Gil Z; Horowitz G
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Apr; 139(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 23519690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operating room versus office-based injection laryngoplasty: a comparative analysis of reimbursement.
Bové MJ; Jabbour N; Krishna P; Flaherty K; Saul M; Wunar R; Rosen CA
Laryngoscope; 2007 Feb; 117(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 17204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost analysis of office-based and operating room procedures in rhinology.
Prickett KK; Wise SK; DelGaudio JM
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2012; 2(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 22252977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Office-based vs. operating room-performed laryngopharyngeal surgery: a review of cost differences.
Schimberg AS; Wellenstein DJ; van den Broek EM; Honings J; van den Hoogen FJA; Marres HAM; Takes RP; van den Broek GB
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Nov; 276(11):2963-2973. PubMed ID: 31486936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Office-based laser surgery of the larynx: cost-effective treatment at the office's expense.
Kuo CY; Halum SL
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 May; 146(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 22261492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delayed regional metastases, distant metastases, and second primary malignancies in squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx and hypopharynx.
Spector JG; Sessions DG; Haughey BH; Chao KS; Simpson J; El Mofty S; Perez CA
Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):1079-87. PubMed ID: 11404625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx.
Wenig BL; Ziffra KL; Mafee MF; Schild JA
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Jun; 28(3):609-19. PubMed ID: 7675471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
