398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22521801)
1. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Bailey MA; Coughlin PA; Sohrabi S; Griffin KJ; Rashid ST; Troxler MA; Scott DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-orientated web sites on laryngectomy: is their information readable?
Pothier L; Pothier DD
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Nov; 18(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 19549174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The quality of information available on the internet about aortic aneurysm and its endovascular treatment].
San Norberto EM; Taylor J; Salvador R; Revilla A; Merino B; Vaquero C
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):869-75. PubMed ID: 21782311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.
Dy CJ; Taylor SA; Patel RM; Kitay A; Roberts TR; Daluiski A
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1881-7. PubMed ID: 22857909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Myelomeningocele information on the internet is accessible and of variable quality, and requires a high reading level.
Bergman J; Konijeti R; Lerman SE
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17296433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.
Fabricant PD; Dy CJ; Patel RM; Blanco JS; Doyle SM
J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Jun; 33(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 23653022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Assessment of Available Information on the World Wide Web for Patients with Lower Limb Arterial Disease.
Dar T; Chowdhury MM; Coughlin PA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2021 Apr; 61(4):620-627. PubMed ID: 33589327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Your patient information website: how good is it?
Soobrah R; Clark SK
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Mar; 14(3):e90-4. PubMed ID: 21883807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of vascular surgery Web sites on the Internet.
Grewal P; Williams B; Alagaratnam S; Neffendorf J; Soobrah R
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 56(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 22801107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronary angioplasty and the internet: what can patients searching online expect to find?
Kirthi V; Modi BN
J Interv Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 25(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 22672356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the quality and readability of thyroplasty information on the Internet.
Ting K; Hu A
J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 24314830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of natural health products in treating osteoporosis: what is the quality of internet patient advice?
Whelan AM; Jurgens TM; Bowles SK; Doyle H
Ann Pharmacother; 2009 May; 43(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 19417114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery.
Goslin RA; Elhassan HA
Laryngoscope; 2013 Jul; 123(7):1626-31. PubMed ID: 23720201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glue ear: how good is the information on the World Wide Web?
Ritchie L; Tornari C; Patel PM; Lakhani R
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Feb; 130(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 26805389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.
Jo JH; Kim EJ; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Mar; 125(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 29325852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
Walsh TM; Volsko TA
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
