These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22522283)

  • 1. Design, characterisation and in vivo testing of a new, adjustable stiffness, external fixator for the rat femur.
    Glatt V; Evans CH; Matthys R
    Eur Cell Mater; 2012 Apr; 23():289-98; discussion 299. PubMed ID: 22522283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjustable stiffness, external fixator for the rat femur osteotomy and segmental bone defect models.
    Glatt V; Matthys R
    J Vis Exp; 2014 Oct; (92):e51558. PubMed ID: 25350129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical characterization of external fixator stiffness for a rat femoral fracture model.
    Willie B; Adkins K; Zheng X; Simon U; Claes L
    J Orthop Res; 2009 May; 27(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 18985701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved healing of large segmental defects in the rat femur by reverse dynamization in the presence of bone morphogenetic protein-2.
    Glatt V; Miller M; Ivkovic A; Liu F; Parry N; Griffin D; Vrahas M; Evans C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2063-73. PubMed ID: 23172324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An external fixation method and device to study fracture healing in rats.
    Mark H; Bergholm J; Nilsson A; Rydevik B; Strömberg L
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Aug; 74(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 14521302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new device to control mechanical environment in bone defect healing in rats.
    Strube P; Mehta M; Putzier M; Matziolis G; Perka C; Duda GN
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2696-702. PubMed ID: 18644596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of interfragmentary motion associated with common osteosynthesis devices for rat fracture healing studies.
    Meyers N; Sukopp M; Jäger R; Steiner M; Matthys R; Lapatki B; Ignatius A; Claes L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176735. PubMed ID: 28453556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modulation of fixation stiffness from flexible to stiff in a rat model of bone healing.
    Bartnikowski N; Claes LE; Koval L; Glatt V; Bindl R; Steck R; Ignatius A; Schuetz MA; Epari DR
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Apr; 88(2):217-222. PubMed ID: 27841708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical study of a new design multifunction dynamic external fixator system for bone reconstructions.
    Suksathien Y; Suksathien R
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Oct; 94(10):1224-9. PubMed ID: 22145508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of nail rigidity on fracture healing. Strength and mineralisation in rat femoral bone.
    Utvåg SE; Reikerås O
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1998; 118(1-2):7-13. PubMed ID: 9833097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stiffness of the locking compression plate as an external fixator for treating distal tibial fractures: a biomechanics study.
    Liu W; Yang L; Kong X; An L; Hong G; Guo Z; Zang L
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 28103852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator.
    Meeson R; Moazen M; Sanghani-Kerai A; Osagie-Clouard L; Coathup M; Blunn G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Nov; 99():161-168. PubMed ID: 31357063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical performance of hybrid Ilizarov external fixator in comparison with Ilizarov circular external fixator.
    Yilmaz E; Belhan O; Karakurt L; Arslan N; Serin E
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jul; 18(6):518-22. PubMed ID: 12828901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Successful repair of a critical-sized bone defect in the rat femur with a newly developed external fixator.
    Zhao Z; Yang D; Ma X; Zhao H; Nie C; Si Z
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2009 Oct; 219(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 19776528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro biomechanical testing of different configurations of acrylic external skeletal fixator constructs.
    Tyagi SK; Aithal HP; Kinjavdekar P; Amarpal ; Pawde AM; Srivastava T; Singh J; Madhu DN
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 25998130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical properties of the Pinless external fixator on human tibiae.
    Remiger AR
    Injury; 1992; 23 Suppl 3():S28-43. PubMed ID: 1286919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new animal model for bone atrophic nonunion: fixation by external fixator.
    Kaspar K; Matziolis G; Strube P; Sentürk U; Dormann S; Bail HJ; Duda GN
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1649-55. PubMed ID: 18548587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stiffness characteristics and inter-fragmentary displacements with different hybrid external fixators.
    Yang L; Nayagam S; Saleh M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Feb; 18(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 12550816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical simulation research to both the external fixation surgery scheme of intertrochanteric fracture and the healing process, and its clinical application.
    Wang XK; Ye JD; Gu FS; Wang AG; Zhang CQ; Tian QQ; Li X; Dong LM
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):625-32. PubMed ID: 24211947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical comparison of two external fixator clamp designs.
    Kraus KH; Wotton HM; Rand WM
    Vet Surg; 1998; 27(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 9605234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.