186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22522820)
1. Survey of Dutch doctors finds evidence of widespread research misconduct.
Sheldon T
BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2898. PubMed ID: 22522820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities.
Callaway E
Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7371):15. PubMed ID: 22051650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. All above board: openness is the only option if science is to maintain its integrity.
New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):3. PubMed ID: 15139348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
Garfield E
Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research].
Klasen EC; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(35):1622-4. PubMed ID: 12233155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sense of injustice can lead scientists to act unethically, study finds.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2006 Apr; 52(33):A21. PubMed ID: 16789294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics and fraud in science: a review of scientific misconduct and applications to craniofacial research.
Eliades T; Athanasiou AE; Papadopulos JS
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 16164106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The road to fraud starts with a single step.
Crocker J
Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7372):151. PubMed ID: 22071724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How far do you trust your colleagues?
Neufeld A
New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Under a microscope: high-profile cases bring new scrutiny to science's superstars.
Rosenthal E
N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():A6. PubMed ID: 16450467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Academic fraud: perspectives from a lifelong anesthesia researcher.
Mutch WA
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):782-4, 784-8. PubMed ID: 21643872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ghost story: at medical journals, writers paid by industry play big role.
Mathews AW
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Dec; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 16506304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
