These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22522820)

  • 21. Stop misbehaving!
    Neill US
    J Clin Invest; 2006 Jul; 116(7):1740-1. PubMed ID: 16823470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fraud in biomedical research - the role of journal Editors.
    De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
    Vascul Pharmacol; 2011; 55(5-6):119-20. PubMed ID: 21983415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
    Efron R
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Science, fraud and the Baltimore case.
    Bernstein J
    Commentary; 1998 Dec; 106(6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15986525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tribunal clears obesity researcher of fraud.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6944):6. PubMed ID: 12840722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fraud and deceit in science.
    Schraffordt Koops SE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):809-10. PubMed ID: 22290192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Legal medicine: the ombudsman of medical ethics.
    Ficarra BJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():151-67. PubMed ID: 11645599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science.
    Annau Z
    Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
    Pennock RT
    Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Illmensee inquiry finds chaos--but no fraud.
    MacKenzie D
    New Sci; 1984 Feb; 101(1398):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
    Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Revoking the licenses of dishonest academics.
    Holder AR
    IRB; 1990; 12(2):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
    Interlandi J
    N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Life After Research Misconduct.
    Galbraith KL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fraud in medical research.
    Lock S
    Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct: why we need more open governance.
    Gandevia S
    Spinal Cord; 2018 Sep; 56(9):821-822. PubMed ID: 30194444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The ethics of research publication.
    Muller MJ; Soares M
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2017 May; 71(5):569. PubMed ID: 28465597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The process of publication.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples?
    Bouter LM
    Account Res; 2015; 22(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 25635847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.