149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22524071)
21. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars.
Gross LC; Griffen AL; Casamassimo PS
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11242726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
Atieh M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
Vaikuntam J
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture strength of adhesively restored pulpotomized primary molars.
el-Kalla IH; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(4):238-42, 228. PubMed ID: 10529865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: a randomised controlled trial.
Sakai VT; Moretti AB; Oliveira TM; Fornetti AP; Santos CF; Machado MA; Abdo RC
Br Dent J; 2009 Aug; 207(3):E5; discussion 128-9. PubMed ID: 19629145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Conservative technique for restoring primary molars after pulpotomy treatment.
Berg JH; Donly KJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(6):463-4. PubMed ID: 2848875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Restoring primary anterior teeth.
Waggoner WF
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 12412967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.
Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008; 118(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 18491670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions.
Onal B; Pamir T
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1547-55. PubMed ID: 16329418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Restorative Techniques for Permanent First Molars Affected by Hypomineralization: A Systematic Review.
Lopes-Fatturi A; Wambier L; Rolim TZC; Reis A; de Souza JF
Pediatr Dent; 2022 Jan; 44(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 35232531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Retrospective record review: reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy: a retrospective study.
Hui-Derksen EK; Chen CF; Majewski R; Tootla RG; Boynton JR
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 23635897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars.
Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Osorio LB; Hadani PE; Pinto AS
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 11132507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.
Gaintantzopoulou MD; Gopinath VK; Zinelis S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 27165307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Esthetic restoration of primary incisors.
Carranza F; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 10477982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
