These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22524071)

  • 41. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Restoration of primary molars with Compoglass.
    Garcia-Godoy F
    Signature; 1995; ():10-3. PubMed ID: 9227143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
    Bektas Donmez S; Uysal S; Dolgun A; Turgut MD
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Direct restorative material use of selected practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Brunton PA; Hickel R; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2002 Oct; 9(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 12483789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical survey on type of restoration in deciduous teeth.
    Fukuyama T; Oda S; Yamashita H; Sekiguchi H; Yakushiji M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2008 Feb; 49(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 18580051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
    Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; Folkesson UH; van Dijken JW
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Aug; 55(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 9298168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months.
    Welbury RR; Shaw AJ; Murray JJ; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10975160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Restoration of primary molars using a new "compomer" material.
    Swift EJ; Vann WF
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 7(8):25-30; quiz 32. PubMed ID: 9002898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
    Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Kreulen CM; Weerheijm KL; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(1):23-9, 12. PubMed ID: 10360200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth. State of the art 2001.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11258095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
    dos Santos MP; Passos M; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth.
    Mjör IA; Dahl JE; Moorhead JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Jan; 60(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 11902609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy with a light-cured cavity-sealing material after two years.
    Gruythuysen RJ; Weerheijm KL
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 9328675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.