These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22524071)

  • 61. The prescription and relative outcomes of different materials used in general dental practice in the north west region of England to restore the primary dentition.
    Milsom KM; Tickle M; Blinkhorn A
    J Dent; 2002; 30(2-3):77-82. PubMed ID: 12381406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Glass-ionomer-resin restoration of primary molars with adjacent Class II carious lesions.
    Croll TP; Killian CM
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Oct; 24(10):723-7. PubMed ID: 8121987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
    Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: a review.
    Hse KM; Leung SK; Wei SH
    Aust Dent J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10217014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month Follow-up.
    Rosenberg L; Atar M; Daronch M; Honig A; Chey M; Funny MD; Cruz L
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23635886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Restorative treatment on Class I and II restorations in primary molars: a survey of Brazilian dental schools.
    Motisuki C; Lima LM; dos Santos-Pinto L; Guelmann M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 30(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 16491976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration of primary molars with proximating Class II caries lesions.
    Croll TP; Berg JH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Jul; 28(7):372-6; quiz 377, 386. PubMed ID: 17687899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A practical overview of pediatric restorative dentistry.
    Haney KL
    J Okla Dent Assoc; 2007 Oct; 99(2):17-26; quiz 27. PubMed ID: 18019932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Tooth-coloured materials for class II restorations in primary molars: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Siokis V; Michailidis T; Kotsanos N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2021 Dec; 22(6):1003-1013. PubMed ID: 34046871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Radiopacity of esthetic restorative materials compared with human tooth structure.
    Hara AT; Serra MC; Haiter-Neto F; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 11949799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy.
    Vij R; Coll JA; Shelton P; Farooq NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 15185801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Reliability of different techniques to assess marginal defects of Class II restorations in retrieved primary molars: a visual-tactile, SEM, dye penetration and polarized light microscopy study.
    Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Donly KJ; Cervantes M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Oct; 19(4):6-16, 67. PubMed ID: 12510251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. An Assessment of Direct Restorative Material Use in Posterior Teeth by American and Canadian Pediatric Dentists: I. Material Choice.
    Varughese RE; Andrews P; Sigal MJ; Azarpazhooh A
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Nov; 38(7):489-496. PubMed ID: 28281954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature.
    Burgess JO; Walker R; Davidson JM
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):465-79. PubMed ID: 12412962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Evidence-based assessment of tooth-colored restorations in proximal lesions of primary molars.
    Toh SL; Messer LB
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18041507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.