These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22524538)

  • 41. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Variations in processing resources and resistance to false memories in younger and older adults.
    Dehon H
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):692-711. PubMed ID: 16829487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of attention on age-related relational memory deficits: fMRI evidence from a novel attentional manipulation.
    Kim SY; Giovanello KS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3637-56. PubMed ID: 21568640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Younger and older adults' recall of typical and atypical actions from script-based text: evidence for interruption and bizarre-imagery effects.
    Davidson D; Malmstrom T; Burden MJ; Luo Z
    Exp Aging Res; 2000; 26(4):409-30. PubMed ID: 11091945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interfering with remembering and knowing: effects of divided attention at retrieval.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17599796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: a comparison of young and elderly participants.
    Grandjean J; Collette F
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 21885178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The bizarreness effect: evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes.
    Geraci L; McDaniel MA; Miller TM; Hughes ML
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1228-37. PubMed ID: 23737359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effects of pure pair repetition on younger and older adults' associative memory.
    Kilb A; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):706-19. PubMed ID: 21341929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Memory and organization in elderly subjects.
    Basden BH; Basden DR; Bartlett K
    Exp Aging Res; 1993; 19(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 8444265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of item difficulty on the retrieval of solutions during cognitive skill acquisition: age differences.
    Onyper SV; Hoyer WJ; Cerella J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 May; 15(3):358-83. PubMed ID: 18421628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A test of the frontal lobe functioning hypothesis of age deficits in production priming.
    Geraci L
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Sep; 20(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16938016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.
    McDaniel MA; DeLosh EL; Merritt PS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 10946377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Remembering what the doctor said: organization and adults' memory for medical information.
    McGuire LC
    Exp Aging Res; 1996; 22(4):403-28. PubMed ID: 8968711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Distinctiveness and the attentional boost effect.
    Smith SA; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1464-1473. PubMed ID: 29389185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. False memories in children and adults: age, distinctiveness, and subjective experience.
    Ghetti S; Qin J; Goodman GS
    Dev Psychol; 2002 Sep; 38(5):705-18. PubMed ID: 12220049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Neural correlates of cued recall in young and older adults: an event-related potential study.
    Angel L; Fay S; Bouazzaoui B; Granjon L; Isingrini M
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 19033876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Individual differences in executive functioning modulate age effects on the ERP correlates of retrieval success.
    Angel L; Fay S; Bouazzaoui B; Isingrini M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3540-53. PubMed ID: 20709089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 26237617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The systematic use of semantic and acoustic processing by younger and older adults.
    West RL; Cohen SL
    Exp Aging Res; 1985; 11(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 4092721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.