These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22524791)

  • 21. Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Demetriou C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 22686154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Mahon BZ; Costa A; Peterson R; Vargas KA; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):503-35. PubMed ID: 17470003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Flanker and Simon effects interact at the response selection stage.
    Treccani B; Cubelli R; Della Sala S; Umilta C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009; 62(9):1784-804. PubMed ID: 19180364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
    Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of interletter spacing in visual-word recognition.
    Perea M; Moret-Tatay C; Gómez P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 21545978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modulating brain mechanisms resolving lexico-semantic Interference during word production: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.
    Henseler I; Mädebach A; Kotz SA; Jescheniak JD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1403-17. PubMed ID: 24405107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Category expectations: a differential modulation of the N170 potential for faces and words.
    Aranda C; Madrid E; Tudela P; Ruz M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4038-45. PubMed ID: 20933531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dissociating response conflict from numerical magnitude processing in the brain: an event-related fMRI study.
    Ansari D; Fugelsang JA; Dhital B; Venkatraman V
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):799-805. PubMed ID: 16731007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lexical selection is competitive: evidence from indirectly activated semantic associates during picture naming.
    Melinger A; Abdel Rahman R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):348-64. PubMed ID: 22732034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audiovisual semantic interference and attention: evidence from the attentional blink paradigm.
    Van der Burg E; Brederoo SG; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 20176341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Why the leash constrains the dog: the impact of semantic associations on sentence production.
    Sass K; Heim S; Sachs O; Theede K; Muehlhaus J; Krach S; Kircher T
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2010; 70(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 21196951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The SNARC effect in the processing of second-language number words: further evidence for strong lexico-semantic connections.
    De Brauwer J; Duyck W; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 17853205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trait anxiety and the dynamics of attentional control.
    Osinsky R; Gebhardt H; Alexander N; Hennig J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 22044800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 15111228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of concurrent working memory load on distractor and conflict processing in a name-face Stroop task.
    Jongen EM; Jonkman LM
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jan; 48(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 20525010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Primes and flankers: source confusions and discounting.
    Denton SE; Shiffrin RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):852-66. PubMed ID: 22528611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantic interference in picture naming during dual-task performance does not vary with reading ability.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Roete I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1758-68. PubMed ID: 25397667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.