140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22526193)
1. A comparative analysis between fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty (PFC Sigma) and rotating platform total knee arthroplasty (PFC-RP) with minimum 3-year follow-up.
Jawed A; Kumar V; Malhotra R; Yadav CS; Bhan S
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Jun; 132(6):875-81. PubMed ID: 22526193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years.
Bhan S; Malhotra R; Kiran EK; Shukla S; Bijjawara M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Oct; 87(10):2290-6. PubMed ID: 16203896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomised study comparing rotating platform and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty in a cruciate substituting design--outcomes at two year follow-up.
Ferguson KB; Bailey O; Anthony I; James PJ; Stother IG; M J G B
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 24145068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Choe JW; Kim HJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(10):866-73. PubMed ID: 22617913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty with the LCS rotating platform mobile bearing knee system and the PFC Sigma RP-F mobile bearing knee system.
Kwak JY; Jeong JH; Lee SH; Jung HJ; Jung YB
Clin Orthop Surg; 2012 Dec; 4(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 23205234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study.
Choi WC; Lee S; Seong SC; Jung JH; Lee MC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2634-42. PubMed ID: 20952606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs: surgical technique.
Luna JT; Sembrano JN; Gioe TJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():240-9. PubMed ID: 20844179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 116 months.
Bistolfi A; Massazza G; Lee GC; Deledda D; Berchialla P; Crova M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(12):e83. PubMed ID: 23783214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
Vogt JC; Saarbach C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ashour A; Saintmard B; Aubaniac JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Apr; 94(7):638-44. PubMed ID: 22488620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized prospective study comparing mobile-bearing against fixed-bearing PFC Sigma cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties with ten-year minimum follow-up.
Powell AJ; Crua E; Chong BC; Gordon R; McAuslan A; Pitto RP; Clatworthy MG
Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct; 100-B(10):1336-1344. PubMed ID: 30295539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. P.F.C Sigma
Riaz O; Aqil A; Sisodia G; Chakrabarty G
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Dec; 27(8):1145-1149. PubMed ID: 28210821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fixation of high-flexion total knee prostheses: five-year follow-up results of a four-arm randomized controlled clinical and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis study.
Nieuwenhuijse MJ; van der Voort P; Kaptein BL; van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Oct; 95(19):e1411-11. PubMed ID: 24088976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary total knee arthroplasty using the P.F.C Sigma®-rotating platform cruciate retaining endoprosthesis--a 6 year follow up.
Bhatt H; Rambani R; White W; Chakrabarty G
Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):856-9. PubMed ID: 22595399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of press-fit condylar sigma fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the same patients.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kulkarni SS; Kim YH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 96(19):e168. PubMed ID: 25274796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results.
Ranawat AS; Rossi R; Loreti I; Rasquinha VJ; Rodriguez JA; Ranawat CS
J Arthroplasty; 2004 Jan; 19(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 14716648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same patients. A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a similar design of prosthesis.
Kim YH; Kim DY; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jul; 89(7):904-10. PubMed ID: 17673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial.
Gioe TJ; Glynn J; Sembrano J; Suthers K; Santos ER; Singh J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Sep; 91(9):2104-12. PubMed ID: 19723986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: survivorship and prevalence of osteolysis: results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(15):1378-84. PubMed ID: 22854990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patellar clunk syndrome in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised versus cruciate-substituting prostheses.
Tang YH; Wong WK; Wong HL
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2014 Apr; 22(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 24781620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
