172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22526698)
1. Ethnic differences in pedicle and bony spinal canal dimensions calculated from computed tomography of the cervical spine: a review of the English-language literature.
Chazono M; Tanaka T; Kumagae Y; Sai T; Marumo K
Eur Spine J; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1451-8. PubMed ID: 22526698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomographic morphometric analysis of cervical pedicles in a multi-ethnic Asian population and relevance to subaxial cervical pedicle screw fixation.
Munusamy T; Thien A; Anthony MG; Bakthavachalam R; Dinesh SK
Eur Spine J; 2015 Jan; 24(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 25155836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer tomography-based morphometric analysis of the cervical spine pedicles C3-C7.
Westermann L; Spemes C; Eysel P; Simons M; Scheyerer MJ; Siewe J; Baschera D
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 Apr; 160(4):863-871. PubMed ID: 29411117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Morphological analysis of the cervical pedicles, lateral masses, and laminae in developmental canal stenosis.
Miyazaki M; Takita C; Yoshiiwa T; Itonaga I; Tsumura H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Nov; 35(24):E1381-5. PubMed ID: 21030896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphometric analysis of cervical spinal canal diameter, transverse foramen, and pedicle width using computed tomography in Indian population.
Sureka B; Mittal A; Mittal MK; Agarwal K; Sinha M; Thukral BB
Neurol India; 2018; 66(2):454-458. PubMed ID: 29547171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomical considerations for cervical pedicle screw insertion: the use of multiplanar computerized tomography reconstruction measurements.
Chazono M; Soshi S; Inoue T; Kida Y; Ushiku C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Jun; 4(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 16776358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomical considerations for cervical pedicle screw insertion: the use of multiplanar computerized tomography measurements in 122 consecutive clinical cases.
Onibokun A; Khoo LT; Bistazzoni S; Chen NF; Sassi M
Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 19699462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of the anatomic features of the cervical spine using computed tomography to select safer screw insertion techniques.
Nishinome M; Iizuka H; Iizuka Y; Takagishi K
Eur Spine J; 2013 Nov; 22(11):2526-31. PubMed ID: 23832384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphological analysis for subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion in developmental and non-developmental canal stenosis.
Wang S; Yang G; Zhu C; Kang J; Wang Q
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):205. PubMed ID: 31077170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Morphometric Study on Subaxial Cervical Pedicles of Thai People.
Mahiphot J; Iamsaard S; Sawatpanich T; Sae-Jung S; Khamanarong K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 May; 44(10):E579-E584. PubMed ID: 30395094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphometric study of cervical spinal canal and transverse foramen diameter using computed tomography: Sex difference and relationship to age in Turkish population.
Tuncer I; Alkan E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Dec; 102(49):e36155. PubMed ID: 38065881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomical feasibility of pediatric cervical pedicle screw insertion by computed tomographic morphometric evaluation of 376 pediatric cervical pedicles.
Kanna PR; Shetty AP; Rajasekaran S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(16):1297-304. PubMed ID: 21289586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review of cervical pedicle dimensions and projections.
Liu J; Napolitano JT; Ebraheim NA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Nov; 35(24):E1373-80. PubMed ID: 21030891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomographic analysis of cervical spine pedicles in the adult Indian population.
Kumar S; Saini NK; Singh D; Chadha M; Mehrotra G
Surg Neurol Int; 2021; 12():68. PubMed ID: 33767872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional changes of cervical and lumbar bony spinal canals in one generation in Western Switzerland: a computed tomography study.
Monier A; Omoumi P; Schizas S; Becce F; Schizas C
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):345-352. PubMed ID: 26814476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical pedicle morphometry in a Latin American population: A Brazilian study.
Herrero CF; Luis do Nascimento A; Maranho DAC; Ferreira-Filho NM; Nogueira CP; Nogueira-Barbosa MH; Defino HLA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jun; 95(25):e3947. PubMed ID: 27336889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle.
Sakamoto T; Neo M; Nakamura T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):2510-4; discussion 2515. PubMed ID: 15543062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anteroposterior diameter of the vertebral canal in cervical region: comparison of anatomical, computed tomographic, and plain film measurements.
Senol U; Cubuk M; Sindel M; Yildirim F; Yilmaz S; Ozkaynak C; Lüleci E
Clin Anat; 2001; 14(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11135392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized tomographic measurement of the cervical pedicles diameter in a Malaysian population and the feasibility for transpedicular fixation.
Yusof MI; Ming LK; Abdullah MS; Yusof AH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(8):E221-4. PubMed ID: 16622365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cadaveric examination of pediatric cervical pedicle morphology.
Vara CS; Thompson GH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(10):1107-12. PubMed ID: 16648744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
