223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2252773)
1. Difference in beta 2-microglobulin removal between cellulosic and synthetic polymer membrane dialyzers.
Mineshima M; Hoshino T; Era K; Kitano Y; Suzuki T; Sanaka T; Teraoka S; Agishi T; Ota K
ASAIO Trans; 1990; 36(3):M643-6. PubMed ID: 2252773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of dialyzers used in shortened dialysis.
Petersen J; Ramsey KD; Kang MS; Yeh IT
ASAIO Trans; 1989; 35(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 2688714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of four different high-flux hemodialyzers under conventional conditions in vivo.
Sombolos K; Tsitamidou Z; Kyriazis G; Karagianni A; Kantaropoulou M; Progia E
Am J Nephrol; 1997; 17(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 9382156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Plasma Proteins on the Transport and Surface Characteristics of Polysulfone/Polyethersulfone and Asymmetric Cellulose Triacetate High Flux Dialyzers.
Kim TR; Hadidi M; Motevalian SP; Sunohara T; Zydney AL
Artif Organs; 2018 Nov; 42(11):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 29774568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The past, present and future of the dialyzer.
Mineshima M
Contrib Nephrol; 2015; 185():8-14. PubMed ID: 26023010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluid and solute transfer characteristics in a dialyzer with a high-performance membrane.
Mineshima M
Contrib Nephrol; 2011; 173():103-109. PubMed ID: 21865782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of formaldehyde/bleach reprocessing on in vivo performances of high-efficiency cellulose and high-flux polysulfone dialyzers.
Murthy BV; Sundaram S; Jaber BL; Perrella C; Meyer KB; Pereira BJ
J Am Soc Nephrol; 1998 Mar; 9(3):464-72. PubMed ID: 9513910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of membrane structure on removal of low molecular weight proteins.
Takesawa S; Ohashi H; Hidai H; Sakai K
Artif Organs; 1987 Dec; 11(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 3326562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased binding of beta-2-microglobulin to blood cells in dialysis patients treated with high-flux dialyzers compared with low-flux membranes contributed to reduced beta-2-microglobulin concentrations. Results of a cross-over study.
Traut M; Haufe CC; Eismann U; Deppisch RM; Stein G; Wolf G
Blood Purif; 2007; 25(5-6):432-40. PubMed ID: 17957097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biocompatibility and performance of a modified cellulosic and a synthetic high flux dialyzer. A randomized crossover comparison between cellulose triacetate and polysulphon.
Grooteman MP; Nubé MJ; van Limbeek J; van Houte AJ; Daha MR; van Geelen JA
ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 7640431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rebound kinetics of beta2-microglobulin after hemodialysis.
Leypoldt JK; Cheung AK; Deeter RB
Kidney Int; 1999 Oct; 56(4):1571-7. PubMed ID: 10504510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dialyzer clearances and mass transfer-area coefficients for small solutes at low dialysate flow rates.
Leypoldt JK; Kamerath CD; Gilson JF; Friederichs G
ASAIO J; 2006; 52(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 16883120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beta 2-microglobulin removal by synthetic dialysis membranes. Mechanisms and kinetics of the molecule.
Ronco C; Heifetz A; Fox K; Curtin C; Brendolan A; Gastaldon F; Crepaldi C; Fortunato A; Pietribasi G; Caberlotto A; Brunello A; Milan Manani S; Zanella M; La Greca G
Int J Artif Organs; 1997 Mar; 20(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9151148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Removal of beta-2-microglobulin by diffusion alone is feasible using highly permeable dialysis membranes.
Naitoh A; Tatsuguchi T; Okada M; Ohmura T; Sakai K
ASAIO Trans; 1988; 34(3):630-4. PubMed ID: 3058183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of dialysis membrane upon protein catabolic rate.
Lindsay RM; Spanner E; Heidenheim AP; Lindsay S; LeFebvre JM
ASAIO Trans; 1991; 37(3):M134-5. PubMed ID: 1751080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in solute removal by two high-flux membranes of nominally similar synthetic polymers.
Ouseph R; Hutchison CA; Ward RA
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 May; 23(5):1704-12. PubMed ID: 18156455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of 3 high-permeability dialysers].
Montagnac R; Schillinger F; Milcent T; Cheriot J; Dupoirieux J; Turret MM; Manceaux JC
Nephrologie; 1987; 8(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 3328103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beta 2-microglobulin kinetics in maintenance hemodialysis: a comparison of conventional and high-flux dialyzers and the effects of dialyzer reuse.
DiRaimondo CR; Pollak VE
Am J Kidney Dis; 1989 May; 13(5):390-5. PubMed ID: 2655439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new polymethylmethacrylate membrane for hemodialysis.
Bonomini M; Fiederling B; Bucciarelli T; Manfrini V; Di Ilio C; Albertazzi A
Int J Artif Organs; 1996 Apr; 19(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 8786174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biocompatibility and functional performance of a polyethylene glycol acid-grafted cellulosic membrane for hemodialysis.
Sirolli V; Di Stante S; Stuard S; Di Liberato L; Amoroso L; Cappelli P; Bonomini M
Int J Artif Organs; 2000 Jun; 23(6):356-64. PubMed ID: 10919752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
