These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks. Ansorge U; Wühr P Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions. Welsh TN Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: ageing and the Simon effect in a go/no-go Simon task. Kubo-Kawai N; Kawai N Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):452-64. PubMed ID: 19575334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence. Wühr P; Biebl R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding. Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect. Nishimura A; Yokosawa K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses. Proctor RW; Vu KP Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect. Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism. Buetti S; Kerzel D Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Ansorge U; Wiihr P J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):365-77. PubMed ID: 15053695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation. Buetti S; Kerzel D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching. Druey MD; Hübner R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping. Proctor RW; Vu KP Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):370-91. PubMed ID: 18609411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Priming processes in the Simon task: more evidence from the lexical decision task for a third route in the Simon effect. Metzker M; Dreisbach G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):892-902. PubMed ID: 21500940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Lu CH; Proctor RW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks. Proctor RW; Vu KP Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]