These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22528872)

  • 1. Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection.
    Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Soto D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):639-46. PubMed ID: 22528872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A parieto-medial temporal pathway for the strategic control over working memory biases in human visual attention.
    Soto D; Greene CM; Kiyonaga A; Rosenthal CR; Egner T
    J Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 32(49):17563-71. PubMed ID: 23223280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.
    Whitehead PS; Ooi MM; Egner T; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 31(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 30938591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociable causal roles for left and right parietal cortex in controlling attentional biases from the contents of working memory.
    Kiyonaga A; Korb FM; Lucas J; Soto D; Egner T
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():200-5. PubMed ID: 24945665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Top down modulation of attention to food cues via working memory.
    Higgs S; Rutters F; Thomas JM; Naish K; Humphreys GW
    Appetite; 2012 Aug; 59(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22450523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological evidence for attentional guidance by the contents of working memory.
    Kumar S; Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(2):307-17. PubMed ID: 19691812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ocular working memory signals are flexible to behavioral priority and subjective imagery strength.
    Dong Y; Kiyonaga A
    J Neurophysiol; 2024 Jul; 132(1):162-176. PubMed ID: 38836298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.
    Balani AB; Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1058-76. PubMed ID: 21156870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory.
    Goolsby BA; Shapiro KL; Raymond JE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 19145023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content.
    Kiyonaga A; Egner T
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():670. PubMed ID: 25221499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different prioritization states of working memory representations affect visual searches: Evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Wang M; Liu H; Chen Y; Yang P; Fu S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Nov; 193():112246. PubMed ID: 37739042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating effects of stimulus identity and load on working memory attentional guidance: lengthening encoding time eliminates the effect of load but not identity.
    Tsvetanov KA; Arvanitis TN; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1475-83. PubMed ID: 22712531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do working memory-driven attention shifts speed up visual awareness?
    Pan Y; Cheng QP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2425-33. PubMed ID: 21837542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory guidance in distractor suppression is governed by the availability of cognitive control.
    Wen W; Hou Y; Li S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1157-1168. PubMed ID: 29582389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parietal structure and function explain human variation in working memory biases of visual attention.
    Soto D; Rotshtein P; Kanai R
    Neuroimage; 2014 Apr; 89():289-96. PubMed ID: 24287439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.