210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22528902)
1. Optimizing peer review: A year of experience after instituting a real-time comment-enhanced program at a children's hospital.
Swanson JO; Thapa MM; Iyer RS; Otto RK; Weinberger E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22528902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review comments augment diagnostic error characterization and departmental quality assurance: 1-year experience from a children's hospital.
Iyer RS; Swanson JO; Otto RK; Weinberger E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 23255752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.
Iyer RS; Munsell A; Weinberger E
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 24948210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.
Borgstede JP; Lewis RS; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17411521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department.
Stanescu AL; Parisi MT; Weinberger E; Ferguson MR; Otto RK; Iyer RS
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 26489791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RADPEER scoring white paper.
Jackson VP; Cushing T; Abujudeh HH; Borgstede JP; Chin KW; Grimes CK; Larson DB; Larson PA; Pyatt RS; Thorwarth WT
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19111267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.
Halsted MJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):984-7. PubMed ID: 17411742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the Radpeer system.
Bender LC; Linnau KF; Meier EN; Anzai Y; Gunn ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1320-7. PubMed ID: 23169725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.
Moriarity AK; Hawkins CM; Geis JR; Dreyer KJ; Kamer AP; Khandheria P; Morey J; Whitfill J; Wiggins RH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 28233533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Focused peer review: the end game of peer review.
Hussain S; Hussain JS; Karam A; Vijayaraghavan G
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jun; 9(6):430-3.e1. PubMed ID: 22632671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward.
Abujudeh H; Pyatt RS; Bruno MA; Chetlen AL; Buck D; Hobbs SK; Roth C; Truwit C; Agarwal R; Kennedy ST; Glenn L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 24842585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance results for a workstation-integrated radiology peer review quality assurance program.
O'Keeffe MM; Davis TM; Siminoski K
Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Jun; 28(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 26892609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review in clinical radiology practice.
Kaewlai R; Abujudeh H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W158-62. PubMed ID: 22826416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologist Peer Review by Group Consensus.
Harvey HB; Alkasab TK; Prabhakar AM; Halpern EF; Rosenthal DI; Pandharipande PV; Gazelle GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jun; 13(6):656-62. PubMed ID: 26908200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output.
Alkasab TK; Harvey HB; Gowda V; Thrall JH; Rosenthal DI; Gazelle GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 24139321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Yield of Learning Opportunities From a Radiology Random Peer Review Program.
Trinh TW; Shinagare AB; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):630-634. PubMed ID: 30016146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback.
Strickland NH
Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1158-64. PubMed ID: 26223739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.
Alpert HR; Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
