191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22528918)
1. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1223-30. PubMed ID: 22528918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.
Gutierrez RL; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 19770321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size.
Liberman L; Mason G; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):426-30. PubMed ID: 16423948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
Partridge SC; Mullins CD; Kurland BF; Allain MD; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1664-73. PubMed ID: 20489111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions.
Eby PR; DeMartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Saini MH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 19696303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-risk breast lesions at imaging-guided needle biopsy: usefulness of MRI for treatment decision.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Linda A; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W240-50. PubMed ID: 22826427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation.
Wang LC; DeMartini WB; Partridge SC; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):826-31. PubMed ID: 19696298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Lee MJ; Kaplan JB; LaTrenta LR; Menell JH; Abramson AF; Dashnaw SM; Ballon DJ; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 12076929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement.
Tozaki M; Igarashi T; Fukuda K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):313-21. PubMed ID: 16861532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of high-risk lesions initially identified with breast MRI.
Strigel RM; Eby PR; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20729462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.
Huang YT; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Kuo WL; Chen SC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21969708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging.
Facius M; Renz DM; Neubauer H; Böttcher J; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 17996602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical significance of breast MRI in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on needle biopsy.
Miyashita M; Amano G; Ishida T; Tamaki K; Uchimura F; Ono T; Yajima M; Kuriya Y; Ohuchi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 23592884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast cancer detected on an incident (second or subsequent) round of screening MRI: MRI features of false-negative cases.
Yamaguchi K; Schacht D; Newstead GM; Bradbury AR; Verp MS; Olopade OI; Abe H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1155-63. PubMed ID: 24147491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
