114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22529077)
1. The double-mobility acetabular component in revision total hip replacement: the United Kingdom experience.
Vasukutty NL; Middleton RG; Matthews EC; Young PS; Uzoigwe CE; Minhas TH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 May; 94(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 22529077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up.
de l'Escalopier N; Dumaine V; Auberger G; Babinet A; Courpied JP; Anract P; Hamadouche M
Int Orthop; 2020 Feb; 44(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31758218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Course of dislocated posterior hip arthroplasty: A continuous 232-patient series at a mean 10 years' follow up (range, 1-22 years).
Martinot P; Blairon A; Putman S; Pasquier G; Girard J; Migaud H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 29277516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum ten-year follow-up of cemented total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Fyda TM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak J; Johnston RC
Iowa Orthop J; 2002; 22():8-19. PubMed ID: 12180617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty.
Sah AP; Estok DM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90(3):506-16. PubMed ID: 18310700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of treatment for dislocation after primary total hip replacement.
Kotwal RS; Ganapathi M; John A; Maheson M; Jones SA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 19258606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up.
Levine BR; Della Valle CJ; Deirmengian CA; Breien KM; Weeden SH; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 18534484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Freeman femoral component with hydroxyapatite coating and retention of the neck: an update with a minimum follow-up of 17 years.
Mannan K; Freeman MA; Scott G
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 20357321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Tripolar arthroplasty for recurrent total hip prosthesis dislocation].
Beaulé PE; Roussignol X; Schmalzried TP; Udomkiat P; Amstutz HC; Dujardin FH
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 May; 89(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 12844048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weber rotation total hip replacement: a prospective 5- to 20-year followup study.
de Jong PT; van der Vis HM; de Man FH; Marti RK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Feb; (419):107-14. PubMed ID: 15021140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total hip arthroplasty dislocation rate following isolated cup revision using Hueter's direct anterior approach on a fracture table.
Cogan A; Klouche S; Mamoudy P; Sariali E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Sep; 97(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 21782540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation.
Sugano N; Nishii T; Miki H; Yoshikawa H; Sato Y; Tamura S
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 17463111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-revision of failed revision Total Hip Arthroplasty acetabular components.
Lim SJ; Lee YS; Lim BH; Park YS
Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Sep; 80(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 26280609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
