148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22529987)
1. Respective prognostic value of genomic grade and histological proliferation markers in early stage (pN0) breast carcinoma.
Reyal F; Bollet MA; Caly M; Gentien D; Carpentier S; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Pierga JY; Cottu P; Dieras V; Sigal-Zafrani B; Vincent-Salomon A; Sastre-Garau X
PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35184. PubMed ID: 22529987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term prognostic performance of Ki67 rate in early stage, pT1-pT2, pN0, invasive breast carcinoma.
Reyal F; Hajage D; Savignoni A; Feron JG; Bollet MA; Kirova Y; Fourquet A; Pierga JY; Cottu P; Dieras V; Fourchotte V; Laki F; Alran S; Asselain B; Vincent-Salomon A; Sigal-Zafrani B; Sastre-Garau X
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e55901. PubMed ID: 23526930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic grade adds prognostic value in invasive lobular carcinoma.
Metzger-Filho O; Michiels S; Bertucci F; Catteau A; Salgado R; Galant C; Fumagalli D; Singhal SK; Desmedt C; Ignatiadis M; Haussy S; Finetti P; Birnbaum D; Saini KS; Berlière M; Veys I; de Azambuja E; Bozovic I; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Larsimont D; Piccart M; Sotiriou C
Ann Oncol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):377-384. PubMed ID: 23028037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of prognostic and predictive impact of genomic or central grade and immunohistochemical subtypes or IHC4 in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: WSG-AGO EC-Doc Trial.
Gluz O; Liedtke C; Huober J; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Kates RE; Kreipe HH; Hartmann A; Pelz E; Erber R; Mohrmann S; Möbus V; Augustin D; Hoffmann G; Thomssen C; Jänicke F; Kiechle M; Wallwiener D; Kuhn W; Nitz U; Harbeck N
Ann Oncol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 27022068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Genomic Grade Assay Compared With Ki67 to Determine Risk of Distant Breast Cancer Recurrence.
Ignatiadis M; Azim HA; Desmedt C; Veys I; Larsimont D; Salgado R; Lyng MB; Viale G; Leyland-Jones B; Giobbie-Hurder A; Kammler R; Dell'Orto P; Rothé F; Laïos I; Ditzel HJ; Regan MM; Piccart M; Michiels S; Sotiriou C
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Feb; 2(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 26633571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the prognostic value of genomic grade index, Ki67 expression and mitotic activity index in early node-positive breast cancer patients.
Bertucci F; Finetti P; Roche H; Le Doussal JM; Marisa L; Martin AL; Lacroix-Triki M; Blanc-Fournier C; Jacquemier J; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Viens P; Sotiriou C; Birnbaum D; Penault-Llorca F
Ann Oncol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):625-32. PubMed ID: 23117074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of breast cancer subtypes, Ki-67 proliferation index, age, and pathologic tumor characteristics on breast cancer survival in Caucasian women.
Ferguson NL; Bell J; Heidel R; Lee S; Vanmeter S; Duncan L; Munsey B; Panella T; Orucevic A
Breast J; 2013; 19(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 23240985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic Grade Index (GGI): feasibility in routine practice and impact on treatment decisions in early breast cancer.
Metzger-Filho O; Catteau A; Michiels S; Buyse M; Ignatiadis M; Saini KS; de Azambuja E; Fasolo V; Naji S; Canon JL; Delrée P; Coibion M; Cusumano P; Jossa V; Kains JP; Larsimont D; Richard V; Faverly D; Cornez N; Vuylsteke P; Vanderschueren B; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Piccart M; Sotiriou C
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e66848. PubMed ID: 23990869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic impact of Ki-67 labeling indices with 3 different cutoff values, histological grade, and nuclear grade in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancers.
Ono M; Tsuda H; Yunokawa M; Yonemori K; Shimizu C; Tamura K; Kinoshita T; Fujiwara Y
Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 23584595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship of Oncotype Dx score with tumor grade, size, nodal status, proliferative marker Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index in early breast cancer tumors in Saudi Population.
Durrani S; Al-Mushawa F; Heena H; Wani T; Al-Qahtani A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Apr; 51():151674. PubMed ID: 33360027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up.
Ohnstad HO; Borgen E; Falk RS; Lien TG; Aaserud M; Sveli MAT; Kyte JA; Kristensen VN; Geitvik GA; Schlichting E; Wist EA; Sørlie T; Russnes HG; Naume B
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 19(1):120. PubMed ID: 29137653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of proliferative index with various clinicopathologic prognostic parameters in primary breast carcinoma: A study from North India.
Marwah N; Batra A; Marwah S; Gupta V; Shakya S; Sen R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(3):537-542. PubMed ID: 29893312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic assessment of breast carcinoma submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pathological non-complete response.
Resende U; Cabello C; Ramalho SOB; Zeferino LC
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):601. PubMed ID: 31208353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined analysis of vascular invasion, grade, HER2 and Ki67 expression identifies early breast cancer patients with questionable benefit of systemic adjuvant therapy.
Synnestvedt M; Borgen E; Russnes HG; Kumar NT; Schlichting E; Giercksky KE; Kåresen R; Nesland JM; Naume B
Acta Oncol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 22934555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prognostic value of mitotic activity index (MAI), phosphohistone H3 (PPH3), cyclin B1, cyclin A, and Ki67, alone and in combinations, in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer.
Klintman M; Strand C; Ahlin C; Beglerbegovic S; Fjällskog ML; Grabau D; Gudlaugsson E; Janssen EA; Lövgren K; Skaland I; Bendahl PO; Malmström P; Baak JP; Fernö M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81902. PubMed ID: 24324728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013.
Ehinger A; Malmström P; Bendahl PO; Elston CW; Falck AK; Forsare C; Grabau D; Rydén L; Stål O; Fernö M;
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27762648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ki67 index in breast cancer: correlation with other prognostic markers and potential in pakistani patients.
Haroon S; Hashmi AA; Khurshid A; Kanpurwala MA; Mujtuba S; Malik B; Faridi N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(7):4353-8. PubMed ID: 23992002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of correlation between mitotic index, MIB1 score and S-phase fraction as proliferation markers in invasive breast carcinoma. Methodological aspects and prognostic value in a series of 257 cases.
Caly M; Genin P; Ghuzlan A A; Elie C; Fréneaux P; Klijanienko J; Rosty C; Sigal-Zafrani B; Vincent-Salomon A; Douggaz A; Zidane M; Sastre-Garau X
Anticancer Res; 2004; 24(5B):3283-8. PubMed ID: 15510624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of proliferation assay in the luminal, HER2-positive, and triple-negative biologic classes of breast cancer.
Aleskandarany MA; Green AR; Benhasouna AA; Barros FF; Neal K; Reis-Filho JS; Ellis IO; Rakha EA
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jan; 14(1):R3. PubMed ID: 22225836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of GATA3, P53, Ki67 status and vascular peritumoral invasion are strongly prognostic in luminal breast cancer.
Jacquemier J; Charafe-Jauffret E; Monville F; Esterni B; Extra JM; Houvenaeghel G; Xerri L; Bertucci F; Birnbaum D
Breast Cancer Res; 2009; 11(2):R23. PubMed ID: 19405945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
