These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22530490)

  • 1. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.
    Yamamoto YT
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-25. PubMed ID: 22530490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Credibility and advocacy in conservation science.
    Horton CC; Peterson TR; Banerjee P; Peterson MJ
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 26041036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Values in environmental research: Citizens' views of scientists who acknowledge values.
    Elliott KC; McCright AM; Allen S; Dietz T
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186049. PubMed ID: 29069087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving invasive species management by integrating priorities and contributions of scientists and decision makers.
    N'Guyen A; Hirsch PE; Adrian-Kalchhauser I; Burkhardt-Holm P
    Ambio; 2016 Apr; 45(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 26541874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between environmental advocacy, values, and science: a survey of ecological scientists' attitudes.
    Reiners DS; Reiners WA; Lockwood JA
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1226-42. PubMed ID: 23967588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 'credibility paradox' in China's science communication: Views from scientific practitioners.
    Zhang JY
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Nov; 24(8):913-27. PubMed ID: 26307594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The case for policy-relevant conservation science.
    Rose DC
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):748-54. PubMed ID: 25545991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
    Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Science and deliberation].
    Ravazzi S
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 19353967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A desire for authoritative science? How citizens' informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Post S; Bienzeisler N; Lohöfener M
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Jul; 30(5):496-514. PubMed ID: 33840287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.
    Cook CN; Mascia MB; Schwartz MW; Possingham HP; Fuller RA
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):669-78. PubMed ID: 23574343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inadvertent advocacy.
    Wilhere GF
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 22280324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility.
    Vraga E; Myers T; Kotcher J; Beall L; Maibach E
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):170505. PubMed ID: 29515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is the public's role in 'space' policymaking? Images of the public by practitioners of 'space' communication in the United Kingdom.
    Entradas M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 25926503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying Effective and Sustainable Measures for Community-Based Environmental Monitoring.
    McKay AJ; Johnson CJ
    Environ Manage; 2017 Sep; 60(3):484-495. PubMed ID: 28497173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.
    Fiske ST; Dupree C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. PubMed ID: 25225372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework.
    Ratcliff CL; Wicke R
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 May; 32(4):410-427. PubMed ID: 36196654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.