These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22530811)

  • 1. Linear measurements using virtual study models.
    Luu NS; Nikolcheva LG; Retrouvey JM; Flores-Mir C; El-Bialy T; Carey JP; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):1098-106. PubMed ID: 22530811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The validity, reliability, and time requirement of study model analysis using cone-beam computed tomography-generated virtual study models.
    Luu NS; Mandich MA; Flores-Mir C; El-Bialy T; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 23590668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
    Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim J; Heo G; Lagravère MO
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23957664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linear accuracy and reliability of volume data sets acquired by two CBCT-devices and an MSCT using virtual models: a comparative in-vitro study.
    Wikner J; Hanken H; Eulenburg C; Heiland M; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Riecke B; Friedrich RE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25936361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
    Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.
    Fleming PS; Marinho V; Johal A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Feb; 14(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21205164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of 3D dental and skeletal landmarks on CBCT images.
    Park J; Baumrind S; Curry S; Carlson SK; Boyd RL; Oh H
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Sep; 89(5):758-767. PubMed ID: 30883187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery.
    Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
    Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Validity and reliability of digital diagnostic measurements on digital three-dimensional dental models].
    Wiranto MG; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Engelbrecht WP; Ren Y
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2012 Feb; 119(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 22428274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of maxillofacial landmark identification on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images of patients with mandibular prognathism: Comparative study of a tentative method and traditional cephalometric analysis.
    Fuyamada M; Shibata M; Nawa H; Yoshida K; Kise Y; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):966-73. PubMed ID: 24745629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
    Naji P; Alsufyani NA; Lagravère MO
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.