These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22531098)

  • 1. Addressing the computational cost of large EIT solutions.
    Boyle A; Borsic A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):787-800. PubMed ID: 22531098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fast parallel solver for the forward problem in electrical impedance tomography.
    Jehl M; Dedner A; Betcke T; Aristovich K; Klöfkorn R; Holder D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):126-37. PubMed ID: 25069109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing computational costs in large scale 3D EIT by using a sparse Jacobian matrix with block-wise CGLS reconstruction.
    Yang CL; Wei HY; Adler A; Soleimani M
    Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):645-58. PubMed ID: 23719094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
    de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimizing EIT image artefacts from mesh variability in finite element models.
    Adler A; Lionheart WR
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):823-34. PubMed ID: 21646712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3-D electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains with known internal boundaries.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 17260850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct EIT Jacobian calculations for conductivity change and electrode movement.
    Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S89-99. PubMed ID: 18544810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid.
    Soleimani M; Powell CE; Polydorides N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 15889545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the GRID to improve the computation speed of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction algorithms.
    Fritschy J; Horesh L; Holder DS; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S209-15. PubMed ID: 15798234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Metherall P; Barber DC; Smallwood RH; Brown BH
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6574):509-12. PubMed ID: 8606768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sampling of finite elements for sparse recovery in large scale 3D electrical impedance tomography.
    Javaherian A; Soleimani M; Moeller K
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Jan; 36(1):43-66. PubMed ID: 25501046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient forward solver in electrical impedance tomography by spectral element method.
    Lim KH; Lee JH; Ye G; Liu QH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Aug; 25(8):1044-51. PubMed ID: 16894997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
    Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
    Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconstruction convergence and speed enhancement in electrical impedance tomography for domains with known internal boundaries.
    Rezajoo S; Hossein-Zadeh GA
    Physiol Meas; 2010 Nov; 31(11):1499-516. PubMed ID: 20938064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging.
    Levy S; Adam D; Bresler Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):676-87. PubMed ID: 12166865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.