These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22531168)

  • 1. Electrode contact impedance sensitivity to variations in geometry.
    Cardu R; Leong PH; Jin CT; McEwan A
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 22531168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Numerical sensitivity modeling for the detection of skin tumors by using tetrapolar probe.
    Ramos A; Bertemes-Filho P
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2011 Dec; 30(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 22047461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of electrode geometry and cell location on single-cell impedance measurement.
    Wang JW; Wang MH; Jang LS
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Feb; 25(6):1271-6. PubMed ID: 19926465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel hydrogel-based preparation-free EEG electrode.
    Alba NA; Sclabassi RJ; Sun M; Cui XT
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Aug; 18(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 20423811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-invasive assessment of corneal endothelial permeability by means of electrical impedance measurements.
    Guimera A; Ivorra A; Gabriel G; Villa R
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Dec; 32(10):1107-15. PubMed ID: 20832346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography.
    Rahal M; Khor JM; Demosthenous A; Tizzard A; Bayford R
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S73-84. PubMed ID: 19491443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of micromachined spiked biopotential electrodes.
    Griss P; Tolvanen-Laakso HK; Meriläinen P; Stemme G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Jun; 49(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12046705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A discrete geometric approach to cell membrane and electrode contact impedance modeling.
    Affanni A; Specogna R; Trevisan F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Sep; 59(9):2619-27. PubMed ID: 22801483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of corneal endothelial impedance with non-invasive external electrodes--a theoretical study.
    Mandel Y; Laufer S; Rubinsky B
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Mar; 34(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 21835678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FEM analysis of predicting electrode-myocardium contact from RF cardiac catheter ablation system impedance.
    Cao H; Speidel MA; Tsai JZ; Van Lysel MS; Vorperian VR; Webster JG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Jun; 49(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 12046696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
    Wei XF; Grill WM
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
    Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of Bio-Impedance Electrode Topologies for Specific Depth Sensing in Skin Layer.
    Park M; Eom K; Jung MH; Park YS; Lee JY; Nam SH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3961-3964. PubMed ID: 33018867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A data acquisition system for induced current electrical impedance tomography].
    Xiang H; Dong X; Qin M; You F; Shi X; Fu F; Liu R; Ma J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 16156281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation of intraluminal impedance.
    al-Zaben A; Chandrasekar V
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():48-52. PubMed ID: 12724867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
    Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.