These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2253137)
1. Error, ignorance and fraud. Squires BP CMAJ; 1990 Dec; 143(12):1295. PubMed ID: 2253137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Fox MF J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conflict of interest. Müller A Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6409):199. PubMed ID: 8461066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How far do you trust your colleagues? Neufeld A New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB. Hilgartner S IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty. Miller DR Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Apr; 24(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 21252647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud: anonymous 'stars' would not dazzle reviewers. Bauch H Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7083):408. PubMed ID: 16554778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research. Kuzma SM Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it? Relman AS West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 2260288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The peer-review process in medical publishing: a reviewer's perspective. Sellke FW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 126(6):1683-5. PubMed ID: 14688671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]