These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2253137)

  • 1. Error, ignorance and fraud.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1990 Dec; 143(12):1295. PubMed ID: 2253137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conflict of interest.
    Müller A
    Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6409):199. PubMed ID: 8461066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How far do you trust your colleagues?
    Neufeld A
    New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
    Hilgartner S
    IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty.
    Miller DR
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Apr; 24(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 21252647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fraud: anonymous 'stars' would not dazzle reviewers.
    Bauch H
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7083):408. PubMed ID: 16554778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
    Kuzma SM
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct.
    Klotz LH
    Can J Urol; 2001 Dec; 8(6):1392. PubMed ID: 11788015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it?
    Relman AS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 2260288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The peer-review process in medical publishing: a reviewer's perspective.
    Sellke FW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 126(6):1683-5. PubMed ID: 14688671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
    Manschot WA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):98. PubMed ID: 7838231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The promise and perils of peer review.
    Rohrich RJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(3):795-7. PubMed ID: 16932192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reflections on scientific fraud.
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6906):417. PubMed ID: 12368816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
    Dayton L
    Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
    Service RF
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is scientific publishing a criminal activity?
    Goldberg DM
    Clin Biochem; 2006 May; 39(5):473-81. PubMed ID: 16730253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publishing].
    Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Sep; 138(36):1822-6. PubMed ID: 7935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breakthrough of the year. Breakdown of the year: scientific fraud.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5807):1853. PubMed ID: 17185568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.