These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22531397)

  • 1. Improvement of success rates for abdominal component reconstructions using bovine fetal collagen.
    Lineaweaver W
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 May; 68(5):438-41. PubMed ID: 22531397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of comorbidities and implant reinforcement on outcomes after component reconstruction of the abdominal wall.
    Varkarakis G; Daniels J; Coker K; Oswald T; Schleich A; Muskett A; Akdemir O; Lineaweaver W
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):595-7. PubMed ID: 20395814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions.
    Patton JH; Berry S; Kralovich KA
    Am J Surg; 2007 Mar; 193(3):360-3; discussion 363. PubMed ID: 17320535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Parker DM; Armstrong PJ; Frizzi JD; North JH
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 16843776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold in abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Pomahac B; Aflaki P
    Am J Surg; 2010 Jan; 199(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 19427629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical Outcomes in Lateral Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques.
    Kapur SK; Liu J; Baumann DP; Butler CE
    J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Sep; 229(3):267-276. PubMed ID: 30998975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominoplasty flap elevation more superficially.
    Koller M; Hintringer T
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Aug; 128(2):102e-103e. PubMed ID: 21788819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning curves in abdominal wall reconstruction with components separation: one step closer toward improving outcomes and reducing complications.
    Hultman CS; Clayton JL; Kittinger BJ; Tong WM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):S126-31. PubMed ID: 24835871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Booth JH; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Selber JC; Nguyen AT; Clemens MW; Liu J; Butler CE
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24083910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biology of biological meshes used in hernia repair.
    Novitsky YW
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Oct; 93(5):1211-5. PubMed ID: 24035083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current options in the management of complex abdominal wall defects.
    Ghazi B; Deigni O; Yezhelyev M; Losken A
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 21372667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.
    Gruber-Blum S; Brand J; Keibl C; Fortelny RH; Redl H; Mayer F; Petter-Puchner AH
    Hernia; 2017 Apr; 21(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 28012032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biological mesh in hernia repair, abdominal wall defects, and reconstruction and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of the clinical evidence.
    Peppas G; Gkegkes ID; Makris MC; Falagas ME
    Am Surg; 2010 Nov; 76(11):1290-9. PubMed ID: 21140701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review.
    Zhong T; Janis JE; Ahmad J; Hofer SO
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1562-71. PubMed ID: 21624851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall hernias using acellular human dermal matrix: a single institution experience.
    Lin HJ; Spoerke N; Deveney C; Martindale R
    Am J Surg; 2009 May; 197(5):599-603; discussion 603. PubMed ID: 19393352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of biological mesh materials in abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Carver DA; Kirkpatrick AW; Eberle TL; Ball CG
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e024091. PubMed ID: 30772851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Clemens MW; Selber JC; Liu J; Adelman DM; Baumann DP; Garvey PB; Butler CE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 22965235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Abdominal reanimation' and massive flank hernias: Moving towards a more functional reconstruction.
    Sadigh P; Burke J; Nikkhah D; Sammartino C; Puliatti C; Sivaprakasam R; Knowles C
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jun; 71(6):941-943. PubMed ID: 29426810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilization of bovine acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall reconstruction: a retrospective case series.
    Wietfeldt ED; Hassan I; Rakinic J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Aug; 55(8):52-6. PubMed ID: 19717856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abdominal wall repair using human acellular dermis.
    Bellows CF; Albo D; Berger DH; Awad SS
    Am J Surg; 2007 Aug; 194(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 17618803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.