These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22531454)

  • 1. Applications of minimally invasive cardiac output monitors.
    Porhomayon J; Zadeii G; Congello S; Nader ND
    Int J Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 5():18. PubMed ID: 22531454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [None invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients in the emergency department].
    Almela Quilis A; Millán Soria J; Alonso Íñigo JM; García Bermejo P
    Emergencias; 2015 Dic; 27(6):386-395. PubMed ID: 29094841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive cardiac output technologies in the ICU: putting it all together.
    Clement RP; Vos JJ; Scheeren TWL
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2017 Aug; 23(4):302-309. PubMed ID: 28538248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiac output monitoring: Technology and choice.
    Kobe J; Mishra N; Arya VK; Al-Moustadi W; Nates W; Kumar B
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2019; 22(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 30648673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A Chinese consensus statement on the clinical application of transesophageal echocardiography for critical care (2019)].
    Yin WH; Wang XT; Liu DW; Kang Y; Chao YG; Zhang LN; Zhang HM; Wu J; Liu LX; Zhu R; He W; ;
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 58(12):869-882. PubMed ID: 31775449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review.
    Porhomayon J; El-Solh A; Papadakos P; Nader ND
    Intern Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 7(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 22147648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: current and emerging technology.
    Chaney JC; Derdak S
    Crit Care Med; 2002 Oct; 30(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12394965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac output monitoring: a contemporary assessment and review.
    Thiele RH; Bartels K; Gan TJ
    Crit Care Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 25251758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring: agreement of oesophageal Doppler, LiDCOrapid™ and Vigileo FloTrac™ monitors in non-cardiac surgery.
    Phan TD; Kluger R; Wan C
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2016 May; 44(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 27246939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative hemodynamic instability and monitoring.
    Minokadeh A; Pinsky MR
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2016 Aug; 22(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 27253843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring.
    Morgan P; Al-Subaie N; Rhodes A
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2008 Jun; 14(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 18467894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in hemodynamically unstable intensive care patients: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.
    Takala J; Ruokonen E; Tenhunen JJ; Parviainen I; Jakob SM
    Crit Care; 2011 Jun; 15(3):R148. PubMed ID: 21676229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
    Teboul JL; Saugel B; Cecconi M; De Backer D; Hofer CK; Monnet X; Perel A; Pinsky MR; Reuter DA; Rhodes A; Squara P; Vincent JL; Scheeren TW
    Intensive Care Med; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1350-9. PubMed ID: 27155605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill Patient - Current Status and Perspective.
    Sakka SG
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2015; 2():44. PubMed ID: 26284244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinician-performed ultrasound in hemodynamic and cardiac assessment: a synopsis of current indications and limitations.
    Kelly N; Esteve R; Papadimos TJ; Sharpe RP; Keeney SA; DeQuevedo R; Portner M; Bahner DP; Stawicki SP
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(5):469-80. PubMed ID: 26038013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicenter study of noninvasive monitoring systems as alternatives to invasive monitoring of acutely ill emergency patients.
    Shoemaker WC; Belzberg H; Wo CC; Milzman DP; Pasquale MD; Baga L; Fuss MA; Fulda GJ; Yarbrough K; Van DeWater JP; Ferraro PJ; Thangathurai D; Roffey P; Velmahos G; Murray JA; Asensio JA; ElTawil K; Dougherty WR; Sullivan MJ; Patil RS; Adibi J; James CB; Demetriades D
    Chest; 1998 Dec; 114(6):1643-52. PubMed ID: 9872201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Update on minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring in thoracic anesthesia.
    Hofer CK; Rex S; Ganter MT
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2014 Feb; 27(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 24304864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Less or more hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
    Jozwiak M; Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2018 Aug; 24(4):309-315. PubMed ID: 29889132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interrater reliability of cardiac output measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound: implications for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ED.
    Nguyen HB; Losey T; Rasmussen J; Oliver R; Guptill M; Wittlake WA; Corbett SW
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Nov; 24(7):828-35. PubMed ID: 17098106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output in critically ill patients by analysis of the finger blood pressure waveform.
    Hirschl MM; Binder M; Gwechenberger M; Herkner H; Bur A; Kittler H; Laggner AN
    Crit Care Med; 1997 Nov; 25(11):1909-14. PubMed ID: 9366778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.