905 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22531900)
1. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Controlled motion with the XL-TDR lateral-approach lumbar total disk replacement: in vitro kinematic investigation.
Pimenta L; Turner A; Oliveira L; Marchi L; Cornwall B
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 76(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 25545808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a novel in vitro cadaveric model for analysis of biomechanics and surgical treatment of Bertolotti syndrome.
Golubovsky JL; Colbrunn RW; Klatte RS; Nagle TF; Briskin IN; Chakravarthy VB; Gillespie CM; Reith JD; Jasty N; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP
Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):638-656. PubMed ID: 31669612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of cervical total disc replacement on motion in the target and adjacent segments.
Vogt M; Mehren C; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 38301903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Effect of L
Cai XY; Sun MS; Huang YP; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Du CF; Yang Q
Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(3):917-930. PubMed ID: 32476282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol.
Goel VK; Grauer JN; Patel TCh; Biyani A; Sairyo K; Vishnubhotla S; Matyas A; Cowgill I; Shaw M; Long R; Dick D; Panjabi MM; Serhan H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2755-64. PubMed ID: 16371899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
Gao SG; Lei GH; He HB; Liu H; Xiao WF; Wen T; Liang JY; Li KH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 21780862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.
Erkan S; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Hsu B; Pahl DW; Transfeldt EE
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):807-14. PubMed ID: 19352729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.
Knapik GG; Mendel E; Marras WS
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S641-52. PubMed ID: 21445618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The move-C cervical artificial disc can restore intact range of motion and 3-D kinematics.
Vogt M; Zengerle L; Jonas R; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):340-351. PubMed ID: 37660895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
