These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22533026)

  • 1. Correlation of different cephalometric measurements to define facial type.
    Paranhos LR; Benedicto EN; Nunes MF; Kairalla SA; Siqueira DF; Torres FC
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 22533026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of vertical characteristics with different cephalometric measurements.
    Benedicto EN; Kairalla SA; Oliveira GMS; Junior LRM; Rosário HD; Paranhos LR
    Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 27011750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective cephalometric study on upper airway spaces in different facial types.
    Sprenger R; Martins LAC; Dos Santos JCB; de Menezes CC; Venezian GC; Degan VV
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 28762153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association between the facial type and morphology of the upper central incisor in normal occlusion subjects.
    Paranhos LR; Zaroni M; Carli JP; Okamoto R; Zogheib LV; Torres FC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 24939261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.
    Tanaka JL; Ono E; Filho Medici E; Cesar de Moraes L; Cezar de Melo Castilho J; Leonelli de Moraes ME
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 17190230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric standards for white Brazilians.
    Cerci V; Martins JE; de Oliveira MA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8182299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):41-9. PubMed ID: 27653263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group.
    Lin CH; Short LL; Banting DW
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22866592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric norms for Central Indian population using Burstone and Legan analysis.
    Yadav AO; Walia CS; Borle RM; Chaoji KH; Rajan R; Datarkar AN
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 21525673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of cephalometric occlusal characteristics between the long face pattern and pattern I.
    de Oliveira EG; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):86-93. PubMed ID: 24094016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of airway dimensions in skeletal Class I malocclusion subjects with different vertical facial patterns.
    Flores-Blancas AP; Carruitero MJ; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):35-42. PubMed ID: 29364377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Elucidative analysis of anthropological methods as an instrument for determining the typological by normal external anatomy of the European or Caucasian facial system. IV. and V].
    Muzj E
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1985 Jun; 46(3):165-80. PubMed ID: 3860459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
    Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.
    Pithon MM; Mata KR; Rocha KS; Costa Bdo N; Neves F; Barbosa GC; Coqueiro Rda S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 25466472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.
    Alcalde RE; Jinno T; Pogrel MA; Matsumura T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9461133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO): cephalometric norms for a Moroccan population.
    Ousehal L; Jouhadi E; Bennani A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 26747660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form.
    Zhang X; Hans MG; Graham G; Kirchner HL; Redline S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 17208108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].
    Zhou S; Ou P; Yu M; Guo X; Shao C; He L; Su H
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 40(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 25931229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric evaluation of white Brazilian adult skeleton.
    Gerhardt De Oliveira M; Salim Silveira V; Whemeyer Fregapani P; Bocchese Gallo T
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009; 58(11-12):585-91. PubMed ID: 20027129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical facial patterns: a cross-sectional study in growing children.
    Lione R; Franchi L; Noviello A; Bollero P; Fanucci E; Cozza P
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Oct; 35(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 24081727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.