335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22533404)
1. Evaluation of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by use of a rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer in dogs before and after elective phacoemulsification.
Thompson-Hom AL; Gerding PA
Am J Vet Res; 2012 May; 73(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 22533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs.
Priehs DR; Gum GG; Whitley RD; Moore LE
Am J Vet Res; 1990 Oct; 51(10):1547-50. PubMed ID: 2240775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses.
Knollinger AM; La Croix NC; Barrett PM; Miller PE
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2005 Jul; 227(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 16047660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lam AK; Wu R; Wang Z; Woo V; Chan E; Tam K; Chau R; Wong KK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 20362856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes.
Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology.
von Spiessen L; Karck J; Rohn K; Meyer-Lindenberg A
Vet Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24131625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry.
Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; Selleri P
Vet Rec; 2013 Apr; 172(15):396. PubMed ID: 23486504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure with the rebound tonometer and the applanation tonometer in normal dogs.
Park YW; Jeong MB; Kim TH; Ahn JS; Ahn JT; Park SA; Kim SE; Seo K
Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 14(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 21521440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (TonoVet) with the applanation tonometer (TonoPen XL) in normal Eurasian Eagle owls (Bubo bubo).
Jeong MB; Kim YJ; Yi NY; Park SA; Kim WT; Kim SE; Chae JM; Kim JT; Lee H; Seo KM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2007; 10(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 17970999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma.
Slack JM; Stiles J; Moore GE
Vet Rec; 2012 Oct; 171(15):373. PubMed ID: 22915681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of I Care rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelium keratoplasty].
Li BZ; Hong J; Peng RM; Wang X; Ren J; Wu LL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23866708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry before and after cataract surgery.
Heinrich MA; Eppig T; Langenbucher A; Walter S; Behrens-Baumann W; Viestenz A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 22365580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
Pereira FQ; Bercht BS; Soares MG; da Mota MG; Pigatto JA
Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 14(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 21929609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.
Bhan A; Browning AC; Shah S; Hamilton R; Dave D; Dua HS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1389-92. PubMed ID: 11980851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
