292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22533576)
1. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis.
Kim K; Kim YH; Kim SY; Kim S; Lee YJ; Kim KP; Lee HS; Ahn S; Kim T; Hwang SS; Song KJ; Kang SB; Kim DW; Park SH; Lee KH
N Engl J Med; 2012 Apr; 366(17):1596-605. PubMed ID: 22533576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LOCAT (low-dose computed tomography for appendicitis trial) comparing clinical outcomes following low- vs standard-dose computed tomography as the first-line imaging test in adolescents and young adults with suspected acute appendicitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Ahn S;
Trials; 2014 Jan; 15():28. PubMed ID: 24438500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-dose CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adolescents and young adults (LOCAT): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
LOCAT Group
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Nov; 2(11):793-804. PubMed ID: 28919126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis.
Kim SY; Lee KH; Kim K; Kim TY; Lee HS; Hwang SS; Song KJ; Kang HS; Kim YH; Rhee JE
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):437-45. PubMed ID: 21633052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delaying surgery to perform CT scans for suspected appendicitis decreases the rate of negative appendectomies without increasing the rate of perforation nor postoperative complications.
Sauvain MO; Slankamenac K; Muller MK; Wildi S; Metzger U; Schmid W; Wydler J; Clavien PA; Hahnloser D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Aug; 401(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 27146319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pediatric CT dose reduction for suspected appendicitis: a practice quality improvement project using artificial gaussian noise--part 2, clinical outcomes.
Callahan MJ; Anandalwar SP; MacDougall RD; Stamoulis C; Kleinman PL; Rangel SJ; Bachur RG; Taylor GA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):636-44. PubMed ID: 25714297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.
McDonald GP; Pendarvis DP; Wilmoth R; Daley BJ
Am Surg; 2001 Nov; 67(11):1017-21. PubMed ID: 11730216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low vs. standard dose computed tomography in suspected acute appendicitis: Is it time for a change?
Aly NE; McAteer D; Aly EH
Int J Surg; 2016 Jul; 31():71-9. PubMed ID: 27262882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Accuracy of Low-dose Computed Tomography Protocol in Patients With Suspected Acute Appendicitis: The OPTICAP Study.
Sippola S; Virtanen J; Tammilehto V; Grönroos J; Hurme S; Niiniviita H; Lietzen E; Salminen P
Ann Surg; 2020 Feb; 271(2):332-338. PubMed ID: 30048324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective.
Raja AS; Wright C; Sodickson AD; Zane RD; Schiff GD; Hanson R; Baeyens PF; Khorasani R
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):460-5. PubMed ID: 20529988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Fewer unnecessary appendectomies following ultrasonography and CT].
Leeuwenburgh MM; Bakker OJ; Gorzeman MP; Bollen TL; Seldenrijk CA; Go PM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A869. PubMed ID: 20456809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation.
Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Spigland N; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2001; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12594877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and False-Referral Rates of 2-mSv CT Relative to Standard-Dose CT for Appendiceal Perforation: Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kim HY; Ko Y; Park JH; Lee KH;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Oct; 215(4):874-884. PubMed ID: 32783554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical guidelines, computed tomography scan, and negative appendectomies: a case series.
Harswick C; Uyenishi AA; Kordick MF; Chan SB
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Jan; 24(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 16338513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study.
Coursey CA; Nelson RC; Patel MB; Cochran C; Dodd LG; Delong DM; Beam CA; Vaslef S
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 20093517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of US and CT on the effect on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation in adolescents and adults: A post-hoc analysis using propensity-score methods.
Lee J; Ko Y; Ahn S; Park JH; Kim HJ; Hwang SS; Lee KH;
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Sep; 44(7):401-10. PubMed ID: 26990317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison.
Kim K; Lee CC; Song KJ; Kim W; Suh G; Singer AJ
J Emerg Med; 2008 Jan; 34(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 18022782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominal CT Does Not Improve Outcome for Children with Suspected Acute Appendicitis.
Miano DI; Silvis RM; Popp JM; Culbertson MC; Campbell B; Smith SR
West J Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 16(7):974-82. PubMed ID: 26759641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
