These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22533945)

  • 21. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment.
    Lachmann S; Laval JY; Axmann D; Weber H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 21483888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dental implants: early versus standard two-stage loading (animal study).
    Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Gholamreza T; Razavi M
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 22214517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs.
    Valderrama P; Bornstein MM; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom FL; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1025-34. PubMed ID: 21142981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
    Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
    J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality of reporting of descriptive studies in implant dentistry. Critical aspects in design, outcome assessment and clinical relevance.
    Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 39 Suppl 12():108-13. PubMed ID: 22533950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapid Osseointegration of Titanium Implant With Innovative Nanoporous Surface Modification: Animal Model and Clinical Trial.
    Huang MS; Chen LK; Ou KL; Cheng HY; Wang CS
    Implant Dent; 2015 Aug; 24(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 25946663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
    Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of drilling technique on the early integration of plateau root form endosteal implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Giro G; Marin C; Granato R; Bonfante EA; Suzuki M; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2158-63. PubMed ID: 21530048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality of reporting of interventional animal studies in rheumatology: a systematic review using the ARRIVE guidelines.
    Ting KH; Hill CL; Whittle SL
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2015 Jun; 18(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 26082348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of the influence of the macro- and microstructure of dental zirconium implants on osseointegration: a minipig study.
    Mueller CK; Solcher P; Peisker A; Mtsariashvilli M; Schlegel KA; Hildebrand G; Rost J; Liefeith K; Chen J; Schultze-Mosgau S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jul; 116(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 22762921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Novel Experimental Dental Implant Permits Quantitative Grading of Surface-Property Effects on Osseointegration.
    Hunziker EB; Spiegl-Habegger M; Rudolf S; Liu Y; Gu Z; Lippuner K; Shintani N; Enggist L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):967-978. PubMed ID: 30231082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative analysis of osseointegration of titanium implants with acid-etched surfaces and different biomolecular coatings.
    Mueller CK; Thorwarth M; Schmidt M; Schlegel KA; Schultze-Mosgau S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):726-36. PubMed ID: 21441047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What physical and/or biochemical characteristics of roughened endosseous implant surfaces particularly enhance their bone-implant contact capability?
    Cooper LF; Deporter D; Wennerberg A; Hämmerle C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 15839126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.
    Barfeie A; Wilson J; Rees J
    Br Dent J; 2015 Mar; 218(5):E9. PubMed ID: 25766196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early Osseointegration Events on Neoss® ProActive and Bimodal Implants: A Comparison of Different Surfaces in an Animal Model.
    Grossi-Oliveira GA; Antunes AA; Elias CN; Wennerberg A; Sennerby L; Salata LA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1060-72. PubMed ID: 26780622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surgical experience influences 2-stage implant osseointegration.
    Zoghbi SA; de Lima LA; Saraiva L; Romito GA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2771-6. PubMed ID: 21798649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo evaluation of biofunctionalized implant surfaces with a synthetic peptide (P-15) and its impact on osseointegration. A preclinical animal study.
    Schmitt CM; Koepple M; Moest T; Neumann K; Weisel T; Schlegel KA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1339-1348. PubMed ID: 26567087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: two-year results of a prospective two-center study.
    Morton D; Bornstein MM; Wittneben JG; Martin WC; Ruskin JD; Hart CN; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 19744195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.