These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2253461)

  • 21. Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002.
    Nash D; Chan C; Horowitz D; Vlahov D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 17324096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcomes from a mass media campaign to promote cervical screening in NSW, Australia.
    Morrell S; Perez DA; Hardy M; Cotter T; Bishop JF
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2010 Sep; 64(9):777-83. PubMed ID: 19822553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cervical cancer screening in rural NSW: Health Insurance Commission data compared to self-report.
    Hancock L; Sanson-Fisher R; Kentish L
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1998; 22(3 Suppl):307-12. PubMed ID: 9629814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervical cytology screening. How can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia?
    Hislop TG; Clarke HF; Deschamps M; Joseph R; Band PR; Smith J; Le N; Atleo R
    Can Fam Physician; 1996 Sep; 42():1701-8. PubMed ID: 8828873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Community-Based Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Feasibility Study of Rural Appalachian Women.
    Crosby RA; Hagensee ME; Vanderpool R; Nelson N; Parrish A; Collins T; Jones N
    Sex Transm Dis; 2015 Nov; 42(11):607-11. PubMed ID: 26462184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pap smear results of Victorian teenagers, 1980-1987.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Aug; 28(3):213-5. PubMed ID: 3233083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in women attending the Family Medical Program in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro.
    Augusto EF; Rosa ML; Cavalcanti SM; Oliveira LH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22886356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Women at risk: papanicolaou smear screening in Florida.
    Vincent AL; Greene JN; Hoercherl S; McTague D
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 9260433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Community level cancer control in a Texas barrio: Part I--Theoretical basis, implementation, and process evaluation.
    Ramirez AG; McAlister A; Gallion KJ; Ramirez V; Garza IR; Stamm K; de la Torre J; Chalela P
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):117-22. PubMed ID: 8562211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integration of cervical screening in family planning clinics.
    Claeys P; De Vuyst H; Mzenge G; Sande J; Dhondt V; Temmerman M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Apr; 81(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 12676408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of farm lifestyle and health characteristics: cervical cancer screening among southern farmwomen.
    Carruth AK; Browning S; Reed DB; Skarke L; Sealey L
    Nurs Res; 2006; 55(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16601624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating a community-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Western Kenya: a descriptive study.
    Swanson M; Ibrahim S; Blat C; Oketch S; Olwanda E; Maloba M; Huchko MJ
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):116. PubMed ID: 29970063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain).
    Borràs JM; Guillen M; Sánchez V; Juncà S; Vicente R
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1999 Oct; 8(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 10548398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of mobile technologies for the prevention of cervical cancer in Santiago, Chile study protocol: a randomized controlled trial.
    Momany MC; Martinez-Gutierrez J; Soto M; Capurro D; Ciampi F; Thompson B; Puschel K
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):847. PubMed ID: 29237420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inpatient cervical screening: a survey of patient acceptability.
    Ruge A; Lee C; Brown WJ
    Aust J Public Health; 1995 Feb; 19(1):96-7. PubMed ID: 7734605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Community-based self-collected human papillomavirus screening in rural Zimbabwe.
    Fitzpatrick MB; El-Khatib Z; Katzenstein D; Pinsky BA; Chirenje ZM; McCarty K
    BMC Public Health; 2019 May; 19(Suppl 1):603. PubMed ID: 31138174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Augmentation of Pap smear screening of high risk aboriginal women. Use of a computerised process tool within the Broome Aboriginal Medical Service.
    Couzos S; Wronski I; Murray R; Cox H
    Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Apr; 27(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 9581335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical screening: population-based comparisons between self-reported survey and registry-derived Pap test rates.
    Mamoon H; Taylor R; Morrell S; Wain G; Moore H
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2001 Dec; 25(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 11824984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychosocial Correlates of Ever Having a Pap Test and Abnormal Pap Results in a Sample of Rural Appalachian Women.
    Mark KP; Crosby RA; Vanderpool RC
    J Rural Health; 2018 Mar; 34(2):148-154. PubMed ID: 28872699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Campaign for cervical cancer screening with vaginal smears in women aged 50-69 years in Isère (France). Results of the first round (January 1991-June 1993)].
    Garnier A; Exbrayat C; Bolla M; Marron J; Winckel P; Billette de Villemeur A
    Bull Cancer; 1997 Aug; 84(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 9339183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.