BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22535850)

  • 1. 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and prostate cancer screening rates.
    Prasad SM; Drazer MW; Huo D; Hu JC; Eggener SE
    JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(16):1692-4. PubMed ID: 22535850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stratifying risk--the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and prostate-cancer screening.
    Schröder FH
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Nov; 365(21):1953-5. PubMed ID: 22029756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate-cancer screening--what the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force left out.
    Brett AS; Ablin RJ
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Nov; 365(21):1949-51. PubMed ID: 22029759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grading the new US Preventive Services Task Force prostate cancer screening recommendation.
    Volk RJ; Wolf AM
    JAMA; 2011 Dec; 306(24):2715-6. PubMed ID: 22203540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New US Preventive Service Task Force recommendations for prostate cancer screening: a needed update, but not enough.
    Wroclawski ML
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 29091165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One man at a time--resolving the PSA controversy.
    McNaughton-Collins MF; Barry MJ
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Nov; 365(21):1951-3. PubMed ID: 22029758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comment on the US Preventive Services Task Force's draft recommendation on screening for prostate cancer.
    Kwiatkowski M; Klotz L; Hugosson J; Recker F
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):851-4. PubMed ID: 22285762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decrease in Prostate Cancer Testing Following the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Recommendations.
    Li J; Berkowitz Z; Hall IJ
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(4):491-3. PubMed ID: 26152440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term consequences of the USPSTF Grade D recommendation for prostate-specific antigen screening.
    Joshi SS; Filson CP
    Cancer; 2020 Feb; 126(4):694-696. PubMed ID: 31794066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Society of Urologic Oncology's reply to the US Preventative Services Task Force's recommendation on PSA testing.
    Messing EM; Albertsen P; Andriole GL; Carroll PR; Klein EA
    Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 22243597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force 'D' recommendation on prostate cancer screening and staging.
    Eapen RS; Herlemann A; Washington SL; Cooperberg MR
    Curr Opin Urol; 2017 May; 27(3):205-209. PubMed ID: 28221220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Since the Implementation of the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.
    Rahbar H; Karabon P; Menon M; Trinh QD; Abdollah F
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Dec; 4(6):1002-1004. PubMed ID: 28753856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPTSTF) recommendations against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing on PSA testing in Australia.
    Zargar H; van den Bergh R; Moon D; Lawrentschuk N; Costello A; Murphy D
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 27454454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate Cancer Screening and the Associated Controversy.
    Tabayoyong W; Abouassaly R
    Surg Clin North Am; 2015 Oct; 95(5):1023-39. PubMed ID: 26315521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate cancer screening in men 75 years old or older: an assessment of self-reported health status and life expectancy.
    Hoffman KE; Nguyen PL; Ng AK; D'Amico AV
    J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1798-802. PubMed ID: 20299039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.
    Gejerman G; Ciccone P; Goldstein M; Lanteri V; Schlecker B; Sanzone J; Esposito M; Rome S; Ciccone M; Margolis E; Simon R; Guo Y; Pentakota SR; Sadeghi-Nejad H
    Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Nov; 58(6):423-428. PubMed ID: 29124241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychological research and the prostate-cancer screening controversy.
    Arkes HR; Gaissmaier W
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jun; 23(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 22555966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolving detection and treatment methods change approaches to prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force draft recommendations now align more closely with others.
    Printz C
    Cancer; 2018 Jan; 124(1):11-12. PubMed ID: 29251768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The State of Prescreening Discussions About Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Following Implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force Statement.
    Turini GA; Gjelsvik A; Renzulli JF
    Urology; 2017 Jun; 104():122-130. PubMed ID: 28322897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.
    Cohn JA; Wang CE; Lakeman JC; Silverstein JC; Brendler CB; Novakovic KR; McGuire MS; Helfand BT
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):41.e23-30. PubMed ID: 23911680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.