134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22535884)
21. [Comparison between endorectal MRI (EMRTI) and endorectal sonography (ES) after surgery or therapy for rectal tumors to exclude recurrent or residual tumor].
Pegios W; Hünerbein M; Schröder R; Wust P; Schlag P; Felix R; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):731-7. PubMed ID: 12063603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Application of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer.
Tong T; Yajia G; Huaying W; Weijun P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):1113-8. PubMed ID: 21898079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 3-T MRI of rectal carcinoma: preoperative diagnosis, staging, and planning of sphincter-sparing surgery.
Zhang XM; Zhang HL; Yu D; Dai Y; Bi D; Prince MR; Li C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1271-8. PubMed ID: 18430843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combining prostrate-specific antigen and Gleason score increases the diagnostic power of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer pathological stage.
Tsao CW; Lin MH; Wu ST; Meng E; Tang SH; Chen HI; Sun GH; Yu DS; Chang SY; Cha TL
J Chin Med Assoc; 2013 Jan; 76(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23331777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endometrial cancer: magnetic resonance imaging.
Manfredi R; Gui B; Maresca G; Fanfani F; Bonomo L
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):626-36. PubMed ID: 15886951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Nishitani H
Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):947-53. PubMed ID: 19724949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 3-T MRI in the preoperative evaluation of depth of myometrial infiltration in endometrial cancer.
Torricelli P; Ferraresi S; Fiocchi F; Ligabue G; Jasonni VM; Di Monte I; Rivasi F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 18212237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic MRI of bladder cancer: evaluation of staging accuracy.
Tekes A; Kamel I; Imam K; Szarf G; Schoenberg M; Nasir K; Thompson R; Bluemke D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 15615961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Tumor staging and follow-up care in rectosigmoid carcinoma: colonoscopic endosonography compared to CT, MRI and endorectal MRI].
Meyenberger C; Wildi S; Külling D; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1996 May; 85(19):622-31. PubMed ID: 8693230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MR imaging in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the absence of myometrial invasion.
Nakao Y; Yokoyama M; Hara K; Koyamatsu Y; Yasunaga M; Araki Y; Watanabe Y; Iwasaka T
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):343-7. PubMed ID: 16469365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Assessment of local staging of prostate cancer by endorectal surface coil].
Miki K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Aug; 56(8):2046-51. PubMed ID: 9750505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in staging of superficial bladder cancer.
Scattoni V; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Nava L; Rigatti P; De Cobelli F; Vanzulli A; Del Maschio A
J Urol; 1996 May; 155(5):1594-9. PubMed ID: 8627831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of deep endometrial invasion for patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Hwang JH; Lee NW; Lee KW; Lee JK
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19780740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Endometrial cancer: preoperative staging using three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: a prospective comparative study.
Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Imaoka I; Kagawa Y; Murakami T; Nakamoto A; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Enomoto T; Kimura T; Tomiyama N
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2296-305. PubMed ID: 23508278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours.
Cirillo S; Petracchini M; Della Monica P; Gallo T; Tartaglia V; Vestita E; Ferrando U; Regge D
Clin Radiol; 2008 Aug; 63(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 18625351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?
Latchamsetty KC; Borden LS; Porter CR; Lacrampe M; Vaughan M; Lin E; Conti N; Wright JL; Corman JM
Can J Urol; 2007 Feb; 14(1):3429-34. PubMed ID: 17324322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
