These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22535907)

  • 1. What the human brain likes about facial motion.
    Schultz J; Brockhaus M; Bülthoff HH; Pilz KS
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 May; 23(5):1167-78. PubMed ID: 22535907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lateralization for dynamic facial expressions in human superior temporal sulcus.
    De Winter FL; Zhu Q; Van den Stock J; Nelissen K; Peeters R; de Gelder B; Vanduffel W; Vandenbulcke M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():340-52. PubMed ID: 25463458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotions in motion: dynamic compared to static facial expressions of disgust and happiness reveal more widespread emotion-specific activations.
    Trautmann SA; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1284():100-15. PubMed ID: 19501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic and static facial expressions decoded from motion-sensitive areas in the macaque monkey.
    Furl N; Hadj-Bouziane F; Liu N; Averbeck BB; Ungerleider LG
    J Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 32(45):15952-62. PubMed ID: 23136433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotional processing in a salient motion context: integration of motion and emotion in both V5/hMT+ and the amygdala.
    Hindi Attar C; Müller MM; Andersen SK; Büchel C; Rose M
    J Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 30(15):5204-10. PubMed ID: 20392942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Steady state visually evoked potential correlates of static and dynamic emotional face processing.
    Mayes AK; Pipingas A; Silberstein RB; Johnston P
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Nov; 22(3):145-57. PubMed ID: 19653091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Faces in motion: selectivity of macaque and human face processing areas for dynamic stimuli.
    Polosecki P; Moeller S; Schweers N; Romanski LM; Tsao DY; Freiwald WA
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 33(29):11768-73. PubMed ID: 23864665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociable neural pathways are involved in the recognition of emotion in static and dynamic facial expressions.
    Kilts CD; Egan G; Gideon DA; Ely TD; Hoffman JM
    Neuroimage; 2003 Jan; 18(1):156-68. PubMed ID: 12507452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face processing regions are sensitive to distinct aspects of temporal sequence in facial dynamics.
    Reinl M; Bartels A
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():407-15. PubMed ID: 25132020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic facial expressions evoke distinct activation in the face perception network: a connectivity analysis study.
    Foley E; Rippon G; Thai NJ; Longe O; Senior C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 24(2):507-20. PubMed ID: 21861684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain networks subserving the evaluation of static and dynamic facial expressions.
    Johnston P; Mayes A; Hughes M; Young AW
    Cortex; 2013 Oct; 49(9):2462-72. PubMed ID: 23410736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decoding face information in time, frequency and space from direct intracranial recordings of the human brain.
    Tsuchiya N; Kawasaki H; Oya H; Howard MA; Adolphs R
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e3892. PubMed ID: 19065268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissimilar processing of emotional facial expressions in human and monkey temporal cortex.
    Zhu Q; Nelissen K; Van den Stock J; De Winter FL; Pauwels K; de Gelder B; Vanduffel W; Vandenbulcke M
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():402-11. PubMed ID: 23142071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Passive and motivated perception of emotional faces: qualitative and quantitative changes in the face processing network.
    Skelly LR; Decety J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e40371. PubMed ID: 22768287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Network Interactions Explain Sensitivity to Dynamic Faces in the Superior Temporal Sulcus.
    Furl N; Henson RN; Friston KJ; Calder AJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Sep; 25(9):2876-82. PubMed ID: 24770707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces.
    Schultz J; Pilz KS
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Apr; 194(3):465-75. PubMed ID: 19205678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The neural representation of faces and bodies in motion and at rest.
    O'Toole AJ; Natu V; An X; Rice A; Ryland J; Phillips PJ
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():1-11. PubMed ID: 24486831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotion unfolded by motion: a role for parietal lobe in decoding dynamic facial expressions.
    Sarkheil P; Goebel R; Schneider F; Mathiak K
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 8(8):950-7. PubMed ID: 22962061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic facial expressions are processed holistically, but not more holistically than static facial expressions.
    Tobin A; Favelle S; Palermo R
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1208-21. PubMed ID: 26208146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior superior temporal sulcus is specialized for non-rigid facial motion in both monkeys and humans.
    Zhang H; Japee S; Stacy A; Flessert M; Ungerleider LG
    Neuroimage; 2020 Sep; 218():116878. PubMed ID: 32360168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.