These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22536044)

  • 1. Relationship between endothelial cell loss and microcoaxial phacoemulsification parameters in noncomplicated cataract surgery.
    Mahdy MA; Eid MZ; Mohammed MA; Hafez A; Bhatia J
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2012; 6():503-10. PubMed ID: 22536044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 45-degree Kelman and 45-degree balanced phaco tip designs in torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Demircan S; Ataş M; Göktaş E; Başkan B
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(6):1168-72. PubMed ID: 26682167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of Balanced Torsional Phacoemulsification Tip for Cataract Surgery.
    Sabur H; Eroglu SA; Azarsiz SS
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2022; 34(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 35620374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of microcoaxial with standard clear corneal incisions in torsional handpiece cataract surgery.
    Park YG; Chung SH; Joo CK
    Ophthalmologica; 2012; 227(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21832823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ozil IP torsional mode versus combined torsional/longitudinal microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Helvacioglu F; Tunc Z; Yeter C; Oguzhan H; Sencan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(6):936-42. PubMed ID: 22427146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can we improve the efficacy of modern cataract surgery by using different tip designs? A comparison of balanced and tapered tip in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and manual phacoemulsification.
    Pahlitzsch M; Pahlitzsch ML; Sumarni U; Pahlitzsch T
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 28563995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two different ultrasound methods of phacoemulsification.
    Helvacioglu F; Yeter C; Sencan S; Tunc Z; Uyar OM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 158(2):221-226.e1. PubMed ID: 24792106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataracts.
    Kim DH; Wee WR; Lee JH; Kim MK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):336-40. PubMed ID: 21165231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational study.
    Vasavada V; Vasavada V; Raj SM; Vasavada AR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17531697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds.
    Berdahl JP; Jun B; DeStafeno JJ; Kim T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2091-5. PubMed ID: 19027565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of the New Torsional Phacoemulsification Software Phacoemulsification (Ozil IP) in Hard Cataracts.
    Kotb AM; Elawamry AI
    Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2013; 2(6):372-4. PubMed ID: 26107149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mini-flared Kelman tip, reverse tip, and sidewinder tip with torsional phaco: a prospective randomized comparative study.
    Hida WT; Tzelikis PF; Nakano CT; Motta AF; Alves MR
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015; 78(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 25714532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Computer-assisted phacoemulsification for hard cataracts].
    Zemba M; Papadatu AC; Sîrbu LN; Avram C
    Oftalmologia; 2012; 56(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 23755523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of IOP based infusion system with and without balanced phaco tip on cumulative dissipated energy and estimated fluid usage in comparison to gravity fed infusion in torsional phacoemulsification.
    Malik PK; Dewan T; Patidar AK; Sain E
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2017; 4():22. PubMed ID: 28932753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative studies between longitudinal and torsional modes in phacoemulsification, using active fluidics technology along with the intrepid balanced tip.
    Dasgupta S; Mehra R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 66(10):1417-1422. PubMed ID: 30249825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two phacoemulsification system handpieces: prospective randomized comparative study.
    Cyril D; Brahmani P; Prasad S; Rashme VL; R S; Kamble NR; Balakrishnan L; Nagu K; Shekhar M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Mar; 48(3):328-333. PubMed ID: 34371511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal endothelial morphology and function after torsional and longitudinal ultrasound mode phacoemulsification.
    Módis LJ; Szalai E; Flaskó Z; Németh G
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 29450332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification performed by 12-degree and 22-degree bent tips.
    Helvacioglu F; Yeter C; Tunc Z; Sencan S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1219-25. PubMed ID: 23707410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification using tips with 30-degree and 45-degree aperture angles.
    Helvacioglu F; Sencan S; Yeter C; Tunc Z; Uyar OM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 24440105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.