These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22536180)

  • 21. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices.
    Happe LE
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2020 Aug; 26(8):956-960. PubMed ID: 32715959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
    Iantorno SE; Andras LM; Skaggs DL
    Spine Deform; 2016 Jul; 4(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 27927515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication.
    Kovanis M; Trinquart L; Ravaud P; Porcher R
    Scientometrics; 2017; 113(1):651-671. PubMed ID: 29056795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective.
    Südhof TC
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):e1002547. PubMed ID: 27564858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Learning from open source software projects to improve scientific review.
    Ghosh SS; Klein A; Avants B; Millman KJ
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2012; 6():18. PubMed ID: 22529798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
    Cullen DJ; Macaulay A
    Acad Med; 1992 Dec; 67(12):856-9. PubMed ID: 1457023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
    Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality.
    Callaham ML; Tercier J
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jan; 4(1):e40. PubMed ID: 17411314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.
    Kelly J; Sadeghieh T; Adeli K
    EJIFCC; 2014 Oct; 25(3):227-43. PubMed ID: 27683470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.
    Cobo E; Selva-O'Callagham A; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Dominguez R; Vilardell M
    PLoS One; 2007 Mar; 2(3):e332. PubMed ID: 17389922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Coached Peer Review: Developing the Next Generation of Authors.
    Sidalak D; Purdy E; Luckett-Gatopoulos S; Murray H; Thoma B; Chan TM
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):201-204. PubMed ID: 27191842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers.
    Fernandez-Llimos F;
    Pharm Pract (Granada); 2018; 16(1):1236. PubMed ID: 29619142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "Reproducible" Research in Mathematical Sciences Requires Changes in our Peer Review Culture and Modernization of our Current Publication Approach.
    Schnell S
    Bull Math Biol; 2018 Dec; 80(12):3095-3105. PubMed ID: 30232583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The changing forms and expectations of peer review.
    Horbach SPJMS; Halffman WW
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2018; 3():8. PubMed ID: 30250752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.