BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2253634)

  • 1. Contrast venography: from gold standard to 'golden backup' in clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.
    de Valois JC; van Schaik CC; Verzijlbergen F; van Ramshorst B; Eikelboom BC; Meuwissen OJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1990; 11(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 2253634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lower limb deep vein thrombosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism detected with (99m)Tc-MAA simultaneously with lung perfusion scan.
    Shao W; Zhang F; Zuo S; Wang X; Song J
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2012; 15(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 23106054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radionuclide plethysmography and Tc-99m red blood cell venography in venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography.
    Singer I; Royal HD; Uren RF; Waugh RC; McLaughlin AF; Bautovich GJ; Dyer IA; Fulton RR; Morris JG
    Radiology; 1984 Jan; 150(1):213-7. PubMed ID: 6689764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The judicial use of venous duplex imaging and strain gauge plethysmography (single or combined) in the diagnosis of acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis.
    AbuRahma AF; Kennard W; Robinson PA; Boland JP; Young LL; Alberts S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Jan; 174(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 1729751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast venography, the gold standard for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis: improvement in observer agreement.
    Lensing AW; Büller HR; Prandoni P; Batchelor D; Molenaar AH; Cogo A; Vigo M; Huisman PM; ten Cate JW
    Thromb Haemost; 1992 Jan; 67(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 1615489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and the pelvis and pulmonary embolism in patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies.
    Kinuya K; Kakuda K; Matano S; Sato S; Sugimoto T; Asakura H; Kinuya S; Michigishi T; Tonami N
    Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 15(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 11831396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prevalence of duplex ultrasonography detectable venous thrombosis in patients with suspected or acute pulmonary embolism].
    Barrellier MT; Lezin B; Landy S; Le Hello C
    J Mal Vasc; 2001 Feb; 26(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 11240526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined use of leg scanning and impedance plethysmography in suspected venous thrombosis. An alternative to venography.
    Hull R; Hirsh J; Sackett DL; Powers P; Turpie AG; Walker I
    N Engl J Med; 1977 Jun; 296(26):1497-500. PubMed ID: 865529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is embolic risk conditioned by location of deep venous thrombosis?
    Moser KM; LeMoine JR
    Ann Intern Med; 1981 Apr; 94(4 pt 1):439-44. PubMed ID: 7212500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography.
    Carpenter JP; Holland GA; Baum RA; Owen RS; Carpenter JT; Cope C
    J Vasc Surg; 1993 Nov; 18(5):734-41. PubMed ID: 8230557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of radionuclide venography and contrast venography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.
    Kilpatrick TK; Lichtenstein M; Andrews J; Gibson RN; Neerhut P; Hopper J
    Aust N Z J Med; 1993 Dec; 23(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 8141690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High prevalence of detectable deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
    Girard P; Musset D; Parent F; Maitre S; Phlippoteau C; Simonneau G
    Chest; 1999 Oct; 116(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 10531151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acute thromboscintigraphy with (99m)Tc-apcitide: results of the phase 3 multicenter clinical trial comparing 99mTc-apcitide scintigraphy with contrast venography for imaging acute DVT. Multicenter Trial Investigators.
    Taillefer R; Edell S; Innes G; Lister-James J
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Jul; 41(7):1214-23. PubMed ID: 10914912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reevaluation of the sensitivity of impedance plethysmography for the detection of proximal deep vein thrombosis.
    Ginsberg JS; Wells PS; Hirsh J; Panju AA; Patel MA; Malone DE; McGinnis J; Stevens P; Brill-Edwards P
    Arch Intern Med; 1994 Sep; 154(17):1930-3. PubMed ID: 8074596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of contrast venography, technetium-99m red blood cell venography and impedance plethysmography for deep vein thrombosis.
    Illescas FF; Lerclerc J; Rosenthall L; Wolfson C; Rush C; Herba MJ; Arzoumanian A
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1990 Oct; 41(5):264-9. PubMed ID: 2207787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radionuclide venography in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities: a comparison to contrast venography.
    Mangkharak J; Chiewvit S; Chaiyasoot W; Pusuwan P; Permpikul C; Toopmongkol C; Sriprapaporn W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1998 Jun; 81(6):432-41. PubMed ID: 9676075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Light reflection rheography as a noninvasive screening test for deep venous thrombosis.
    Kuhlmann TP; Sistrom CL; Chance JF
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 May; 21(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 1570905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thromboembolic disease: comparison of combined CT pulmonary angiography and venography with bilateral leg sonography in 70 patients.
    Garg K; Kemp JL; Wojcik D; Hoehn S; Johnston RJ; Macey LC; Barón AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):997-1001. PubMed ID: 11000152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Follow-up of patients with suspected venous thrombosis but negative radionuclide venography.
    Murphy JJ; Chandler ST
    Br J Clin Pract; 1995; 49(5):232-4. PubMed ID: 7492456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and pelvis: MR venography versus duplex Doppler sonography.
    Laissy JP; Cinqualbre A; Loshkajian A; Henry-Feugeas MC; Crestani B; Riquelme C; Schouman-Claeys E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Oct; 167(4):971-5. PubMed ID: 8819396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.