These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22536870)

  • 1. Constructing patch-based ligand-binding pocket database for predicting function of proteins.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 22536870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting local ligand-binding site similarity in nonhomologous proteins by surface patch comparison.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2012 Apr; 80(4):1177-95. PubMed ID: 22275074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
    Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large-scale binding ligand prediction by improved patch-based method Patch-Surfer2.0.
    Zhu X; Xiong Y; Kihara D
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(5):707-13. PubMed ID: 25359888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure- and sequence-based function prediction for non-homologous proteins.
    Sael L; Chitale M; Kihara D
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2012 Jun; 13(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 22270458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.
    Chikhi R; Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2007-28. PubMed ID: 20455259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.
    Glaser F; Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
    Proteins; 2006 Feb; 62(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 16304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Augmented Pocketome: Detection and Analysis of Small-Molecule Binding Pockets in Proteins of Known 3D Structure.
    Bhagavat R; Sankar S; Srinivasan N; Chandra N
    Structure; 2018 Mar; 26(3):499-512.e2. PubMed ID: 29514079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PoLi: A Virtual Screening Pipeline Based on Template Pocket and Ligand Similarity.
    Roy A; Srinivasan B; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1757-70. PubMed ID: 26225536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comprehensive survey of small-molecule binding pockets in proteins.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 9(10):e1003302. PubMed ID: 24204237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PoSSuM: a database of similar protein-ligand binding and putative pockets.
    Ito J; Tabei Y; Shimizu K; Tsuda K; Tomii K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jan; 40(Database issue):D541-8. PubMed ID: 22135290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein 3D Structure and Electron Microscopy Map Retrieval Using 3D-SURFER2.0 and EM-SURFER.
    Han X; Wei Q; Kihara D
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 60():3.14.1-3.14.15. PubMed ID: 29220075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ligand binding site similarity identification based on chemical and geometric similarity.
    Tu H; Shi T
    Protein J; 2013 Jun; 32(5):373-85. PubMed ID: 23700221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural motifs recurring in different folds recognize the same ligand fragments.
    Ausiello G; Gherardini PF; Gatti E; Incani O; Helmer-Citterich M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10():182. PubMed ID: 19527512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D-SURFER: software for high-throughput protein surface comparison and analysis.
    La D; Esquivel-Rodríguez J; Venkatraman V; Li B; Sael L; Ueng S; Ahrendt S; Kihara D
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 25(21):2843-4. PubMed ID: 19759195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined Approach of Patch-Surfer and PL-PatchSurfer for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction in CSAR 2013 and 2014.
    Zhu X; Shin WH; Kim H; Kihara D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1088-99. PubMed ID: 26691286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binding ligand prediction for proteins using partial matching of local surface patches.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    Int J Mol Sci; 2010; 11(12):5009-26. PubMed ID: 21614188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(10):3784-9. PubMed ID: 22355140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.