BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22536905)

  • 1. Win percentage: a novel measure for assessing the suitability of machine classifiers for biological problems.
    Parry RM; Phan JH; Wang MD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S7. PubMed ID: 22536905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
    Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feature selection and classification of MAQC-II breast cancer and multiple myeloma microarray gene expression data.
    Liu Q; Sung AH; Chen Z; Liu J; Huang X; Deng Y
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8250. PubMed ID: 20011240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of feature selection and classification for MALDI-MS data.
    Liu Q; Sung AH; Qiao M; Chen Z; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Huang X; Deng Y
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 19594880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of breast cancer metastasis by gene expression profiles: a comparison of metagenes and single genes.
    Burton M; Thomassen M; Tan Q; Kruse TA
    Cancer Inform; 2012; 11():193-217. PubMed ID: 23304070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Wagner RF; Hadjiiski L
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1509-22. PubMed ID: 10947254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Top scoring pairs for feature selection in machine learning and applications to cancer outcome prediction.
    Shi P; Ray S; Zhu Q; Kon MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; 12():375. PubMed ID: 21939564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strong feature sets from small samples.
    Kim S; Dougherty ER; Barrera J; Chen Y; Bittner ML; Trent JM
    J Comput Biol; 2002; 9(1):127-46. PubMed ID: 11911798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An adaptive optimal ensemble classifier via bagging and rank aggregation with applications to high dimensional data.
    Datta S; Pihur V; Datta S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Aug; 11():427. PubMed ID: 20716381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
    Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fissures segmentation using surface features: content-based retrieval for mammographic mass using ensemble classifier.
    Liu H; Lan Y; Xu X; Song E; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1475-84. PubMed ID: 22055794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of recursive gene selection approaches from microarray data.
    Li F; Yang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(19):3741-7. PubMed ID: 16118263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using multiple classifiers for predicting the risk of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair re-intervention through hybrid feature selection.
    Attallah O; Karthikesalingam A; Holt PJ; Thompson MM; Sayers R; Bown MJ; Choke EC; Ma X
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Nov; 231(11):1048-1063. PubMed ID: 28925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A fuzzy based feature selection from independent component subspace for machine learning classification of microarray data.
    Aziz R; Verma CK; Srivastava N
    Genom Data; 2016 Jun; 8():4-15. PubMed ID: 27081632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A probabilistic classifier ensemble weighting scheme based on cross-validated accuracy estimates.
    Large J; Lines J; Bagnall A
    Data Min Knowl Discov; 2019; 33(6):1674-1709. PubMed ID: 31632184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of multivariate classifiers and response normalizations for pattern-information fMRI.
    Misaki M; Kim Y; Bandettini PA; Kriegeskorte N
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 20580933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The feature selection bias problem in relation to high-dimensional gene data.
    Krawczuk J; Łukaszuk T
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Jan; 66():63-71. PubMed ID: 26674595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of instance selection algorithms for instance-based classifiers in the context of medical decision support.
    Mazurowski MA; Malof JM; Tourassi GD
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 56(2):473-89. PubMed ID: 21191152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature selection for elderly faller classification based on wearable sensors.
    Howcroft J; Kofman J; Lemaire ED
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):47. PubMed ID: 28558724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.