These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22536963)

  • 1. Identification of binding pockets in protein structures using a knowledge-based potential derived from local structural similarities.
    Bianchi V; Gherardini PF; Helmer-Citterich M; Ausiello G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S17. PubMed ID: 22536963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. webPDBinder: a server for the identification of ligand binding sites on protein structures.
    Bianchi V; Mangone I; Ferrè F; Helmer-Citterich M; Ausiello G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W308-13. PubMed ID: 23737450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural motifs recurring in different folds recognize the same ligand fragments.
    Ausiello G; Gherardini PF; Gatti E; Incani O; Helmer-Citterich M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10():182. PubMed ID: 19527512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AHoJ-DB: A PDB-wide Assignment of apo & holo Relationships Based on Individual Protein-Ligand Interactions.
    Feidakis CP; Krivak R; Hoksza D; Novotny M
    J Mol Biol; 2024 Sep; 436(17):168545. PubMed ID: 38508305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein function annotation by local binding site surface similarity.
    Spitzer R; Cleves AE; Varela R; Jain AN
    Proteins; 2014 Apr; 82(4):679-94. PubMed ID: 24166661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phosphate binding sites identification in protein structures.
    Parca L; Gherardini PF; Helmer-Citterich M; Ausiello G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Mar; 39(4):1231-42. PubMed ID: 20974634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.
    Glaser F; Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
    Proteins; 2006 Feb; 62(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 16304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Holo Protein Conformation Generation from Apo Structures by Ligand Binding Site Refinement.
    Zhang J; Li H; Zhao X; Wu Q; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5806-5820. PubMed ID: 36342197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constructing patch-based ligand-binding pocket database for predicting function of proteins.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 22536870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting small ligand binding sites in proteins using backbone structure.
    Bordner AJ
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(24):2865-71. PubMed ID: 18940825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Setting up a large set of protein-ligand PDB complexes for the development and validation of knowledge-based docking algorithms.
    Diago LA; Morell P; Aguilera L; Moreno E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():310. PubMed ID: 17718923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein-protein binding site prediction by local structural alignment.
    Carl N; Konc J; Vehar B; Janezic D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Oct; 50(10):1906-13. PubMed ID: 20919700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ligand-binding site prediction of proteins based on known fragment-fragment interactions.
    Kasahara K; Kinoshita K; Takagi T
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):1493-9. PubMed ID: 20472546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding.
    Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms.
    Hetényi C; van der Spoel D
    Protein Sci; 2011 May; 20(5):880-93. PubMed ID: 21413095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment.
    Yang J; Roy A; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct; 29(20):2588-95. PubMed ID: 23975762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.