These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22537034)

  • 21. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Psychometric properties of the hearing handicap questionnaire: a Kannada (South-Indian) translation.
    Thammaiah S; Manchaiah V; Easwar V; Krishna R; McPherson B
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 27809619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Satisfaction with Hearing Aids among Aged Patients with Different Degrees of Hearing Loss and Length of Daily Use.
    Dashti R; Khiavi FF; Sameni SJ; Bayat A
    J Audiol Otol; 2015 Apr; 19(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 26185786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):306-20. PubMed ID: 10466567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
    Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29338464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
    Johnson EE
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S29-S30. PubMed ID: 28635502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and validation of the audio processor satisfaction questionnaire (APSQ) for hearing implant users.
    Billinger-Finke M; Bräcker T; Weber A; Amann E; Anderson I; Batsoulis C
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):392-397. PubMed ID: 31944127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of low-cut modified amplification strategy and channel-free hearing aid in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Prabhu P; Barman A
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):759-766. PubMed ID: 28485679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.
    Lin K; Bao L; Wang J; Fujita K; Makimoto K; Liao X
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):2992-3004. PubMed ID: 28884273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring motivation using the transtheoretical (stages of change) model: A follow-up study of people who failed an online hearing screening.
    Ingo E; Brännström KJ; Andersson G; Lunner T; Laplante-Lévesque A
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S52-8. PubMed ID: 27206679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Satisfaction level with hearing aid in the daily life of Army Healthcare System users.
    Veiga LR; Merlo AR; Mengue SS
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 16446894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): results from the Chinese version.
    Liu H; Zhang H; Liu S; Chen X; Han D; Zhang L
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):673-8. PubMed ID: 21916818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cultural adaptation of the SADL (satisfaction with amplification in daily life) questionaire for Brazilian Portuguese.
    Mondelli MF; Magalhães FF; Lauris JR
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 22030962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief.
    Shekhawat GS; Searchfield GD; Kobayashi K; Stinear CM
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):617-25. PubMed ID: 23859059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An investigation of the applicability of the inventory, satisfaction with amplification in daily life, at 2 weeks post hearing aid fitting.
    McLeod B; Upfold L; Broadbent C
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 11527040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Health behavior theories as predictors of hearing-aid uptake and outcomes.
    Saunders GH; Frederick MT; Silverman SC; Nielsen C; Laplante-Lévesque A
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S59-68. PubMed ID: 27145934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.