These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22537082)

  • 1. Contamination rates of different urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in young children: an observational cohort study.
    Tosif S; Baker A; Oakley E; Donath S; Babl FE
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2012 Aug; 48(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 22537082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained by Stimulation Technique versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: A Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods.
    Altuntas N; Alan B
    Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(4):326-331. PubMed ID: 31665720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitfalls in Diagnosing Urinary Tract Infection in Children below the Age of 2: Suprapubic Aspiration vs Clean-Catch Urine Sampling.
    Breinbjerg A; Mohamed L; Yde Nielsen S; Rittig S; Tullus K; Kamperis K
    J Urol; 2021 Dec; 206(6):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 34288716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A head-to-head comparison: "clean-void" bag versus catheter urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in young children.
    McGillivray D; Mok E; Mulrooney E; Kramer MS
    J Pediatr; 2005 Oct; 147(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 16227029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children.
    Karacan C; Erkek N; Senel S; Akin Gunduz S; Catli G; Tavil B
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 20357500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urine culture from bag specimens in young children: are the risks too high?
    Al-Orifi F; McGillivray D; Tange S; Kramer MS
    J Pediatr; 2000 Aug; 137(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 10931415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The method of urine sampling is not a valid predictor for vesicoureteral reflux in children after febrile urinary tract infections.
    Haid B; Roesch J; Strasser C; Oswald J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Oct; 13(5):500.e1-500.e5. PubMed ID: 28412102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of Preanalytic Practices on Contamination and Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Cultures: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    LaRocco MT; Franek J; Leibach EK; Weissfeld AS; Kraft CS; Sautter RL; Baselski V; Rodahl D; Peterson EJ; Cornish NE
    Clin Microbiol Rev; 2016 Jan; 29(1):105-47. PubMed ID: 26598386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. To clean or not to clean: effect on contamination rates in midstream urine collections in toilet-trained children.
    Vaillancourt S; McGillivray D; Zhang X; Kramer MS
    Pediatrics; 2007 Jun; 119(6):e1288-93. PubMed ID: 17502345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clean catch urine collection: Time taken and diagnostic implication. A prospective observational study.
    Tosif S; Kaufman J; Fitzpatrick P; Hopper SM; Hoq M; Donath S; Babl FE
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2017 Oct; 53(10):970-975. PubMed ID: 28618045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Diagnosis of Urinary Tract infection in Young children (DUTY): a diagnostic prospective observational study to derive and validate a clinical algorithm for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children presenting to primary care with an acute illness.
    Hay AD; Birnie K; Busby J; Delaney B; Downing H; Dudley J; Durbaba S; Fletcher M; Harman K; Hollingworth W; Hood K; Howe R; Lawton M; Lisles C; Little P; MacGowan A; O'Brien K; Pickles T; Rumsby K; Sterne JA; Thomas-Jones E; van der Voort J; Waldron CA; Whiting P; Wootton M; Butler CC
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Jul; 20(51):1-294. PubMed ID: 27401902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a New Strategy for Clean-Catch Urine in Infants.
    Labrosse M; Levy A; Autmizguine J; Gravel J
    Pediatrics; 2016 Sep; 138(3):. PubMed ID: 27542848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The QuickWee trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of gentle suprapubic cutaneous stimulation to hasten non-invasive urine collection from infants.
    Kaufman J; Fitzpatrick P; Tosif S; Hopper SM; Bryant PA; Donath SM; Babl FE
    BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011357. PubMed ID: 27515752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contamination rates of different methods of urine culture collection in children: A retrospective cohort study.
    Guri A; Hurvitz Florenthal M; Scheier E; Mahlab-Guri K; Balla U
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2021 Aug; 57(8):1281-1287. PubMed ID: 33760325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sample collection methods for urine culture and analysis].
    Ochoa Sangrador C; Brezmes Valdivieso MF;
    An Pediatr (Barc); 2007 Nov; 67(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 17991364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A midstream urine collector is not a good alternative to a sterile collection method during the diagnosis of urinary tract infection.
    Verliat-Guinaud J; Blanc P; Garnier F; Gajdos V; Guigonis V
    Acta Paediatr; 2015 Sep; 104(9):e395-400. PubMed ID: 25857456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of bladder stimulation as a non-invasive technique for urine collection to diagnose urinary tract infection in infants under 6 months: a randomized multicenter study ("EE-Sti.Ve.N").
    Demonchy D; Ciais C; Fontas E; Berard E; Bréaud J; Rohrlich PS; Dubos F; Fortier C; Desmontils J; Hérisse AL; Donzeau D; Haas H; Tran A
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):783. PubMed ID: 31881992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abnormal urinalysis results are common, regardless of specimen collection technique, in women without urinary tract infections.
    Frazee BW; Enriquez K; Ng V; Alter H
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Jun; 48(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 25841289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liquid gold: the cost-effectiveness of urine sample collection methods for young precontinent children.
    Kaufman J; Knight AJ; Bryant PA; Babl FE; Dalziel K
    Arch Dis Child; 2020 Mar; 105(3):253-259. PubMed ID: 31444211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a midstream clean catch mobile application did not lower urine contamination rates in an ED.
    Jacob MS; Kulie P; Benedict C; Ordoobadi AJ; Sikka N; Steinmetz E; McCarthy ML
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 28711277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.