These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22537154)

  • 21. Category content and structure in schizophrenia: an evaluation using the instantiation principle.
    Elvevåg B; Heit E; Storms G; Goldberg T
    Neuropsychology; 2005 May; 19(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 15910123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of childhood hearing loss on organization of semantic memory: typicality and relatedness.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Dougherty M; Mehta J; Spence M
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):686-702. PubMed ID: 17086079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Memory for category information is idealized through contrast with competing options.
    Davis T; Love BC
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20424052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age, typicality, and task effects on categorization of objects.
    Blewitt P; Durkin M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Oct; 55(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 7155742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combining graded categories: membership and typicality.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Jan; 101(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 8121956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What is typical about the typicality effect in category-based induction?
    Rein JR; Goldwater MB; Markman AB
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Apr; 38(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 20234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
    Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incremental Bayesian Category Learning From Natural Language.
    Frermann L; Lapata M
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 40(6):1333-81. PubMed ID: 26534863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exemplars and prototypes in natural language concepts: a typicality-based evaluation.
    Voorspoels W; Vanpaemel W; Storms G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 18567266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Category-specific effects in semantic memory: category-task interactions suggested by fMRI.
    Grossman M; Koenig P; Kounios J; McMillan C; Work M; Moore P
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):1003-9. PubMed ID: 16413792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bogus concerns about the false prototype enhancement effect.
    Homa D; Hout MC; Milliken L; Milliken AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 21261424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of verbal typicality judgments of mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.
    Winters JJ; Hoats DL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1985 Nov; 90(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 4083313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Typicality mediates performance during category verification in both ad-hoc and well-defined categories.
    Sandberg C; Sebastian R; Kiran S
    J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(2):69-83. PubMed ID: 22261305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implicit and explicit processes in category-based induction: is induction best when we don't think?
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):227-46. PubMed ID: 23506087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
    Smith JD; Minda JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: geometric shapes and social categories.
    Rothbart M; Lewis S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Dec; 55(6):861-72. PubMed ID: 3216287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A probabilistic threshold model: analyzing semantic categorization data with the Rasch model.
    Verheyen S; Hampton JA; Storms G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 20682453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrastive Constraints Guide Explanation-Based Category Learning.
    Chin-Parker S; Cantelon J
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Aug; 41(6):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 27564059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.