These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22537427)

  • 1. Rank minimization with a two-step analysis should not replace randomization in clinical trials.
    Kahan BC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):808-9. PubMed ID: 22537427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rank-Minimization with a two-step analysis should replace randomization in clinical trials.
    Taves DR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 22118264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rank minimization with a two-step analysis should not replace randomization in clinical trials.
    Morris T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):810-1. PubMed ID: 22564502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should minimization replace randomization in all clinical trials?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22083018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rebutal of Kahan's critique of rank minimization.
    Taves DR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):809-10. PubMed ID: 22537425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
    Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The pursuit of balance: An overview of covariate-adaptive randomization techniques in clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Zhu M; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):21-5. PubMed ID: 26244705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rank-Minimization for balanced assignment of subjects in clinical trials.
    Stigsby B; Taves DR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Mar; 31(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 20004741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimization in interventional trials: great value but residual vulnerability.
    Treasure T; Farewell V
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 21995972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
    Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use and reporting of restricted randomization: a review.
    Higham R; Tharmanathan P; Birks Y
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1205-11. PubMed ID: 26200039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
    Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of selection bias on test decisions in randomized clinical trials.
    Kennes LN; Cramer E; Hilgers RD; Heussen N
    Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(21):2573-81. PubMed ID: 21717489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
    Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 21320892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection bias, allocation concealment and randomization design in clinical trials.
    Zhao W
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):263-5. PubMed ID: 23871796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Balancing treatment allocations by clinician or center in randomized trials allows unacceptable levels of treatment prediction.
    Hills RK; Gray R; Wheatley K
    J Evid Based Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 21349013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimization does not by its nature preclude allocation concealment and invite selection bias, as Berger claims.
    Taves DR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):323. PubMed ID: 21187164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of minimization in clinical trials.
    Taves DR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Mar; 31(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20060500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.