These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22537428)

  • 41. Informed consent for facial transplantation.
    Renshaw A; Clarke A; Diver AJ; Ashcroft RE; Butler PE
    Transpl Int; 2006 Nov; 19(11):861-7. PubMed ID: 17018120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients' understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings.
    Paris A; Deygas B; Cornu C; Thalamas C; Maison P; Duale C; Kane M; Hodaj E; Cracowski JL
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 80(5):1010-20. PubMed ID: 26147763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Ethics committees bear a responsibility for patient information. Informed consent implies that the patient understands what he has consented to].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Mar; 99(14):1552-5. PubMed ID: 12025208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Informed consent in urology.
    Vargas Blasco C; Martin-Fumadó C; Arimany Manso J
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Jun; 48(5):340-344. PubMed ID: 38191026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An instrument for assessing the quality of informed consent documents for elective procedures: development and testing.
    Spatz ES; Suter LG; George E; Perez M; Curry L; Desai V; Bao H; Geary LL; Herrin J; Lin Z; Bernheim SM; Krumholz HM
    BMJ Open; 2020 May; 10(5):e033297. PubMed ID: 32434933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Enhanced Informed Consent in Hand Surgery: Techniques to Improve the Informed Consent Process.
    DeGeorge BR; Archual AJ; Gehle BD; Morgan RF
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Dec; 79(6):521-524. PubMed ID: 29053523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of a decision aid to assist genetic testing research participants in the informed consent process.
    Sorenson JR; Lakon C; Spinney T; Jennings-Grant T
    Genet Test; 2004; 8(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 15727260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simple genetics language as source of miscommunication between genetics researchers and potential research participants in informed consent documents.
    Morgenstern J; Hegele RA; Nisker J
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Aug; 24(6):751-66. PubMed ID: 24751688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years.
    Berger O; Grønberg BH; Sand K; Kaasa S; Loge JH
    Ann Oncol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 18922881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Can patient decision aids help people make good decisions about participating in clinical trials? A study protocol.
    Brehaut JC; Lott A; Fergusson DA; Shojania KG; Kimmelman J; Saginur R
    Implement Sci; 2008 Jul; 3():38. PubMed ID: 18651981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. National efforts to improve the informed consent process.
    Padberg RM; Flach J
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 1999 May; 15(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 10222513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the National Cancer Institute's Original and Revised Consent Form Templates.
    Masset HA; Hiser M; Atkinson NL; Brittle C; Bailey R; Adler J; Mishkin GE; Denicoff AM; Roach N; Good M; Burgess D; Patrick L; Mooney M; Abrams JS
    IRB; 2017; 39(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 30703315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality of informed consent documents among US. hospitals: a cross-sectional study.
    Spatz ES; Bao H; Herrin J; Desai V; Ramanan S; Lines L; Dendy R; Bernheim SM; Krumholz HM; Lin Z; Suter LG
    BMJ Open; 2020 May; 10(5):e033299. PubMed ID: 32434934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Discerning quality: an analysis of informed consent documents for common cardiovascular procedures.
    Shahu A; Schwartz J; Perez M; Bernheim SM; Krumholz HM; Spatz ES
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Jul; 26(7):569-571. PubMed ID: 27538954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Consent forms for clinical trials are too aggressive.
    Wassersug RJ
    BMJ; 2013 Aug; 347():f4879. PubMed ID: 23943746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Details of risk-benefit communication in informed consent documents for phase I/II trials.
    Kahrass H; Bossert S; Schürmann C; Strech D
    Clin Trials; 2021 Feb; 18(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 33231107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Improving the Quality of Informed Consent in Clinical Research with Information Technology.
    Taber C; Warren J; Day K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 231():135-142. PubMed ID: 27782025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Informed consent: time for more transparency.
    Yazici Y; Yazici H
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2010; 12(3):121. PubMed ID: 20537202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Translated article] Design and validation of two instruments to analyze and evaluate the formal quality in the informed consent process of clinical trials with medicinal products.
    Jaramillo Vélez AG; Aguas Compaired M; Granados Plaza M; Mariño EL; Modamio P
    Farm Hosp; 2023; 47(2):T64-T68. PubMed ID: 36934015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Evaluation and Improvement of the Informed Consent Documents in 9 Hospitals, Spain].
    Calle-Urra JE; Parra-Hidalgo P; Saturno-Hernández P; Fonseca-Miranda Y; Martínez-Martínez MJ
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2015; 89(3):307-19. PubMed ID: 26388344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.