These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22538160)

  • 1. New Criteria for Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors meeting, October 28, 2011.
    Walsh J; Roberts R; Vigersky RA; Schwartz F
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 6(2):466-74. PubMed ID: 22538160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why the New FDA Glucose Meter POCT Guidance Is Disappointing.
    Krouwer JS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1274. PubMed ID: 27923882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glucose meter inaccuracy and the impact on the care of patients.
    Hellman R
    Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2012 Mar; 28(3):207-9. PubMed ID: 22215509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tighter accuracy standards within point-of-care blood glucose monitoring: how six commonly used systems compare.
    Robinson CS; Sharp P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 May; 6(3):547-54. PubMed ID: 22768885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do currently available blood glucose monitors meet regulatory standards? 1-day public meeting in Arlington, Virginia.
    Klonoff DC; Reyes JS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):1071-83. PubMed ID: 23911191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting.
    Hasslacher C; Kulozik F; Platten I
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 24876607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meeting the New FDA Standard for Accuracy of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Systems Intended for Home Use by Lay Users.
    Katz LB; Stewart L; King D; Cameron H
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Sep; 14(5):912-916. PubMed ID: 32059615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of self monitoring blood glucose systems in a clinical setting: application of new planned ISO- standards.
    Hasslacher C; Kulozik F; Platten I
    Clin Lab; 2013; 59(7-8):727-33. PubMed ID: 24133899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytical and clinical performance of blood glucose monitors.
    Boren SA; Clarke WL
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 4(1):84-97. PubMed ID: 20167171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Rutschmann M; Haug C; Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Mende J; Link M; Zschornack E; Haug C; Freckmann G
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31958308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield?
    Heinemann L; Lodwig V; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 6(2):435-43. PubMed ID: 22538158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bedside Glucose Monitoring-Is it Safe? A New, Regulatory-Compliant Risk Assessment Evaluation Protocol in Critically Ill Patient Care Settings.
    DuBois JA; Slingerland RJ; Fokkert M; Roman A; Tran NK; Clarke W; Sartori DA; Palmieri TL; Malic A; Lyon ME; Lyon AW
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Apr; 45(4):567-574. PubMed ID: 28169943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of point-of-care glucose measurements.
    Rebel A; Rice MA; Fahy BG
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 6(2):396-411. PubMed ID: 22538154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Perspective on the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Meters During Pregnancy.
    Immanuel J; Simmons D
    Diabetes Care; 2018 Oct; 41(10):2053-2058. PubMed ID: 30237233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimates of total analytical error in consumer and hospital glucose meters contributed by hematocrit, maltose, and ascorbate.
    Lyon ME; DuBois JA; Fick GH; Lyon AW
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 4(6):1479-94. PubMed ID: 21129345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of simulated altitude on blood glucose meter performance: implications for in-flight blood glucose monitoring.
    Olateju T; Begley J; Flanagan D; Kerr D
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 6(4):867-74. PubMed ID: 22920813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do the New FDA Guidance Documents Help Improving Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared With ISO 15197?
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Pleus S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 28587476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Low-Cost Inkjet-Printed Glucose Test Strip System for Resource-Poor Settings.
    Gainey Wilson K; Ovington P; Dean D
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 9(6):1275-81. PubMed ID: 26071426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Real-World Setting Study: Which Glucose Meter Could Be the Best for POCT Use? An Easy and Applicable Protocol During the Hospital Routine.
    Mancini A; Esposto G; Manfrini S; Rilli S; Tinti G; Carta G; Petrolati L; Vidali M; Barocci S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1053-1060. PubMed ID: 29783898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.